NOM BLOG

UK Blogger Under Investigation for Posting Ad in Support of Marriage

The UK Christian Concern:

A Christian blog writer, who goes by the pseudonym “Archbishop Cranmer”, is under investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for posting an advert on behalf of the Coalition for Marriage.

The Coalition for Marriage is campaigning to preserve the current legal definition of marriage as between one man and one woman. Christian Concern is a leading member of the Coalition.

The investigation was launched after anonymous complaints were received against the blog for featuring the online advert which urged members of the public to sign the Coalition for Marriage petition.

The complainants, including the Jewish Gay & Lesbian Group, have described the advert as “offensive” and “homophobic”. The anonymous writer has now been given until 21 May to respond to the allegations.

The writer behind the blog, which was ranked as the 24th most influential blog in the UK, commented:

"This is nothing short of censorship. Nothing in the advert is factually incorrect or offensive. It is an advert to campaign to simply keep the law as it is. It is outrageous to suggest it is homophobic and the fact that the ASA are even considering such an allegation is ludicrous and displays evidence of a lack of even basic research by them before making the demand of Cranmer that they have done."

Church of Ireland Upholds Marriage as Between One Man and One Woman

The Christian Post, Europe:

The General Synod of the Church of Ireland has passed a motion upholding marriage as a union between one man and one woman.

The motion, passed on Saturday, affirms Canon 31, which states that marriage is "a union permanent and lifelong, for better or worse, till death do them part, of one man with one woman, to the exclusion of all others on either side, for the procreation and nurture of children, for the hallowing and right direction of the natural instincts and affections, and for the mutual society, help and comfort which the one ought to have of the other, both in prosperity and adversity."

The Synod, which met at Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin, agreed that the Church recognized "no other understanding of marriage."

Australian Human Rights Commissioner Forced to Resign After Supporting Marriage

Jason Rushton, Australian correspondent for LifeSiteNews:

A board member of the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission (VEOHRC) has resigned less than 48 hours after Australian media reported that he had signed a document supporting true marriage.

Professor Kuruvilla George, who is also Victoria’s deputy chief psychiatrist, signed a pro-marriage submission to a Senate inquiry on the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2010 in March. (There are currently three bills to change the legal definition of marriage before Australian parliament, which are the subject of two separate inquiries).

When it was revealed on Sunday by various newspapers that Professor George had been one of a group of 150 medical professionals who submitted to the inquiry that “the evidence is clear that children who grow up in a family with a mother and father do better in all parameters than children without,” there were immediate calls for his resignation.

Kerryn Phelps, the former national president of the Australian Medical Association said the group of doctors - who go under the name Doctors for the Family - should “hang their heads in shame”, and that Professor George’s position on the board of the VEOHRC should be reviewed.

“They should immediately disqualify themselves from dealing with matters of sexuality, as they clearly have no idea about its complexities,” she said.

Although Victorian Attorney-General Robert Clark defended Professor George’s right to free speech, opposition Attorney-General Martin Pakula said Professor George needed to explain why he should remain on the board. Victorian Mental Health Minister Mary Wooldridge similarly demanded an “immediate explanation.”

By Tuesday morning, the chair of the board of the VEOHRC, John Searle, announced Professor George’s resignation “due to time constraints and personal reasons.”

For more on this story, see Bill Muehlenberg's commentary.

Australia's Atheist Prime Minister Remains Opposed to SSM

In the Sydney Morning Herald:

Prime Minister Julia Gillard will continue to oppose gay marriage in Australia despite US President Barack Obama publicly endorsing it in a national television interview overnight.

Ms Gillard today said she stood by her beliefs and would not vote for a private member's bill set to be introduced in Federal Parliament later this year to allow same-sex couples to marry.

"I know President Obama has made that statement," Ms Gillard told ABC radio station 774 today.

"I haven't had the opportunity to view it myself. I've seen the reports of it, but no, my view hasn't changed and when a bill comes to the parliament later this year ... I won't vote for it."

Asked if her progressive credentials were not measuring up, Ms Gillard replied: "Well you know, I believe what I believe ... You can judge it."

FRC Video: The Problem With Same-Sex Marriage

Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council has released a new 30-minute documentary explaining some of the impact of redefining marriage:

Christian Marriage Conference in UK Banned for Opposition to Gay Marriage

The Christian Post, Europe:

The organizers of a marriage conference in Britain have been told they can no longer hold the event on their regular hired premises because they support the biblical definition of marriage as between one man and one woman.

The Law Society in England has revoked its permission for "Christian Concern" to hold the conference on its premises saying that the event would breach its "diversity policy" due to the Christian group's religious beliefs that there should be no redefinition of marriage to include same-sex couples.

In an email to Christian Concern, the Law Society's Adam Tallis said the event was "contrary to our diversity policy, espousing as it does an ethos which is opposed to same-sex marriage."

NOM's Goddard: Pacquiao Packs a Punch for Traditional Marriage

Damian Goddard is the spokesman for NOM's Marriage Anti-Defamation Alliance, and writes in LifeSiteNews:

"...Shortly after his being expelled from The Grove, Pacquiao issued the following statement. “I am against gay marriage, but I’m not condemning gays. I have family - a cousin - who’s gay, and friends too. I’m just against gay marriage… To the gay community, I apologize. My favorite verse is ‘Love one another as you love yourself. Love your neighbor.’ So I love everybody!”

It’s one thing to say you are Christian. It is quite another to actually pick up your cross and follow Him; even when it comes to having to tell people things they don’t want to hear. Things like, marriage is the union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.

On June 9th, Pacquiao will step into the ring at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas to defend his WBO Welterweight title. While Timothy Bradley’s got nothing on the forces attempting to destroy marriage, it is clear that Manny Pacquiao is up for the fight. On both fronts. And the world is watching."

Israeli Bill to Legalize SSM Fails 11 to 39

The Jerusalem Post:

The Knesset voted down a bill on Wednesday that would allow same-sex and interfaith couples to wed.

The legislation, proposed by MK Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz), would open the option of civil marriages for those who may not be wed according to Halacha (Jewish law), as well as those who choose not to be married by the Chief Rabbinate. It was rejected, with 39 MKs opposed and 11 in favor.

... After Horowitz presented his bill, Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman gave a succinct rebuttal: “You did not bring your bill to the Ministerial Committee for Legislation, so the government’s official stance is to oppose it. Thank you.”

Anonymous Writer to WSJ: I'm Anonymous For Fear Of Losing My Career

James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal seeks to understand why marriage polls never register the support for marriage we see in actual statewide votes, and can only find an anonymous source to help explain why -- read to the last line:

Every state where same-sex marriage has been on the ballot, it has lost--usually by considerably larger margins, but mostly in socially conservative states. Forty percent support and majority opposition seems in the right ball park.

A reader whose identity we'll conceal explains why the polls may be unreliable on this question:

With a marriage amendment on the ballot in Minnesota, we have been assaulted by the pro-gay marriage media and social-media coverage. I say assaulted because the message is not a positive argument for gay marriage, but rather a tarring as bigots of those who believe in the traditional definition of marriage. So of course polls would undercount support for the traditional view of marriage.

A person could tell a pollster that he believes in a position and risk the pollster thinking that he is bigoted, or he could toe the media line, give the pollster a fulsome answer of support for the measure and then vote his conscience privately.

I know what I do (and why not, anything more public than this email could risk my career).

Video: Maggie Gallagher Answers Why She Joined the Fight to Protect Marriage

NOM co-founder Maggie Gallagher participates in a series by The Daily Beast where readers can ask prominent thinkers anything they want. She answers the question why is protecting marriage against redefinition important along with strengthening marriage against divorce and infidelity:

The Blaze: Church Receives Violent Threats After Posting "Two Men Are Friends, Not Spouses" Sign

Billy Hallowel at The Blaze:

St. Francis Xavier in Acushnet, Massachusetts, isn’t afraid to insert its voice into the contentious gay marriage debate. The church, which posted a controversial sign voicing its disapproval of gay marriage, is reportedly receiving violent threats as a result of it’s anti-gay marriage messaging.

“Two men are friends, not spouses,” read the contentious sign, which was clearly intended to drive home the church’s view that marriage is an institution that should be reserved for men and women, exclusively.

Monsignor Gerard O’Connor, the head of pastoral services, said that the message was posted to reiterate the Catholic Church’s views on the sanctity of marriage. Additionally, he claimed that the original intention was for the church to offer a response to President Barack Obama’s recent gay marriage endorsement.

... “That’s what the church teaches,” O’Connor said in an interview with CBS Boston. “We understand people disagree with us, but we do it out of love. We never said we hate anybody.”

The message, which was intended to capture attention, has certainly grabbed attention. According to staff members at St. Francis Xavier, authorities are keeping a close eye on the house of worship after someone called and threatened to burn it to the ground.

Krauthammer: Obama Is Now Trying to Get Away From SSM As Fast As He Can

Charles Krauthammer in his weekly column for the Washington Post:

"... It’s a howling contradiction to leave up to the states an issue Obama now says is a right. And beyond being intellectually untenable, Obama’s embrace of the more hard-line “rights” argument compels him logically to see believers in traditional marriage as purveyors of bigotry. Not a good place for a president to be in an evenly divided national debate that requires both sides to offer each other a modicum of respect.

No wonder that Obama has been trying to get away from the issue as quickly as possible. It’s not just the New York Timespoll showing his new position to be a net loser. It’s that he is too intelligent not to realize he’s embraced a logical contradiction.

... Notwithstanding a comically fawning press, Obama knows he has boxed himself in. His “rights” argument compels him toward nationalize same-sex marriage and sharpen hostility toward proponents of traditional marriage — a place he is loath to go.

Video: What About the Separation of Church and State?

Kalley Yanta of the Minnesota Marriage Minute answers the question "isn't it wrong for churches to be involved in campaigns [to protect marriage]"?

She responds: "Churches, like everyone else, not only have a constitutional right but a duty to speak out about important issues in the public square. There is a growing movement in America to silence Churches and people of faith, denying them the fundamental right to speak out about public issues. Shrouded in the widely misunderstood concept of 'separation of church and state' want to confine religious viewpoints to the four walls of the church, this is as un-american as it is unconstitutional."

"Obama Just Lost My Mom's Vote" Because of Same-Sex Marriage

Columnist Gregory Kane explains how the issue of marriage convinced his mother, a Black Christian, to no longer support President Obama:

President Barack Hussein Obama might be in some deep trouble. He just lost my mom's vote.

I kind of had a hunch that Obama's support of same-sex marriage might go over with my devoutly Roman Catholic mother like ham and cheese sandwiches at a bar mitzvah. I was right.

"He lost my vote," my mom announced as I sat next to her during my annual Mother's Day visit. If other moms and grandmoms react similarly, Obama might be a one-term president.

...She was with him in 2008, but not in 2012.

And all those tired, worn-out accusations about the "bigotry" of those opposed to same-sex marriage won't work this time, at least not with my mom. She'll turn 90 on May 27. She's been a Mass-attending Catholic for decades and supports her church's position on same-sex marriage. She's not going to be swayed by anyone telling her what a "bigot" she is.

What if other senior citizens -- especially those who voted for Obama in 2008 -- feel the same way? What if there are a bunch of such senior citizens? Proponents of same-sex marriage aren't going to sway many senior citizens over to their position. It certainly won't work to tell them how "bigoted" they are.

... My mom will ease into her wheelchair and roll herself to the nearest polling station to vote out the man she voted in four years ago. Do you have a strategy to win her vote back, Mr. Obama? -- The Washington Examiner

James Dobson: Obama Rips Into Marriage

James Dobson, Ph.D., is a psychologist, broadcaster, best-selling author, and president and founder of James Dobson's Family Talk:

The president’s statement [in support of same-sex marriage] also lacks internal consistency. He said he favors each state’s right to determine the definition of marriage – yet isn’t that precisely what the people of North Carolina did last week? Was their vote of 61 to 39 percent in favor of traditional marriage a fluke, or was it the result of the citizens of North Carolina making their own choice?

And speaking of states’ rights to define marriage, wouldn’t that wreak havoc on individual families? Imagine the chaos of a couple being married in Texas but not married in Arkansas, or being married in Arizona and not married in Massachusetts. Children in one state would be legitimate, but would be the product of unmarried parents in the next. And what about the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts? Could they continue to override the will of the people, as did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in California? And what about inheritance issues from state to state? You would think the president of the United States would have thought through his position and its implications before impulsively making it known to the nation. If traditional marriage is not the law of the land, the institution of the family will cease to exist. --World Net Daily