Over at Bench Memos, Ed Whelan points out that Judge Reinhardt's order refusing to disqualify himself was devoid of content. He says he can explain "in due course" why the facts justify his refusal to recuse himself. But oddly provided NO SUCH FACTS, in his decision denying recusal.
This is one weird lacunae for a federal judge. Not even a hint why his wife's involvement in this case is irrrelevant? And the case to be argued--on Monday???