In The Salt Lake Tribune, Brooke Adams does a fairly good job presenting the essential arguments in the State of Utah's court filing in support of the marriage amendment which is under legal scrutiny by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The headline of the article is its weakest point, declaring "State makes it all about kids in brief against same-sex marriage."
We would say, rather, two things: (1) the State is recognizing that marriage is all about the kids, simply observing marriage as a given phenomenon and institution, preexisting any state -- whereas, on the other hand, it is the marriage redefinition side of the debate that seeks to "make" marriage about something which it is not; and (2) the brief should not therefore be said to be "against same-sex marriage," but instead to be for marriage -- marriage as it has come down to us through history and tradition.
Nevertheless, as we said at the outset, the article does do a rather fair job outlining the most salient points of the State's brief:
Utah has chosen a definition of marriage that is "principally a child-centered institution, one focused first and foremost on the welfare of children rather than the emotional interests of adults," the state said. "And by reinforcing that understanding, the state gently encourages parents to routinely sacrifice their own interests to the legitimate needs and interests of their children."
That definition is not designed to demean other family structures "any more than giving an ‘A’ to some students demeans others," the state said.
You should read the entire article, which has ample additional quotations from the filing.