<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NOM Blog &#187; Cohabitation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nomblog.com/category/cohabitation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nomblog.com</link>
	<description>The official blog of the National Organization for Marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Births to Cohabiting Couples Dramatically Increase</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/22078</link>
		<comments>http://www.nomblog.com/22078#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NOM Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research/Study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=22078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Baptist Press reports on a new study by the National Center for Health Statistics: The number of babies born to unmarried couples who are living together in America has increased dramatically during the past decade, according to a new report by the National Center for Health Statistics. "We were a little surprised in such [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Baptist Press <a href="http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=37654&amp;ref=BPNews-RSSFeed0420" target="_blank">reports</a> on a new study by the National Center for Health Statistics:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://cdn.nomblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CuteBaby-copy.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-22252" title="CuteBaby copy" src="http://cdn.nomblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CuteBaby-copy-300x294.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="188" /></a>The number of babies born to unmarried couples who are living together in America has increased dramatically during the past decade, according to a new report by the National Center for Health Statistics.</p>
<p>"We were a little surprised in such a short time period to see these increases," Gladys Martinez, a demographer and the lead author of the report, said.</p>
<p>About 23 percent of the reported births in the study -- based on face-to-face interviews of 22,000 men and women from 2006 through 2010 -- were to unmarried heterosexual couples who were cohabiting when the child was born. In 2002, the figure from a similar study was 14 percent.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nomblog.com/22078/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Psychologist: The Real &quot;Father Problem&quot; is the Marriage-Absence Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/21940</link>
		<comments>http://www.nomblog.com/21940#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NOM Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=21940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Family psychologist John Rosemond in OneNewsNow: "...Girls who grow up in father-absent homes are more likely, as teenagers, to become pregnant. In that case, they're likely to be single mothers who raise their children in father-absent homes, perpetuating and compounding the original problem. And the wheel keeps on turnin'. Name the problem and it's almost [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Family psychologist John Rosemond in <a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=1581170" target="_blank">OneNewsNow</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://cdn.nomblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Fatherhood.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-21978" title="Fatherhood" src="http://cdn.nomblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Fatherhood-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>"...Girls who grow up in father-absent homes are more likely, as teenagers, to become pregnant. In that case, they're likely to be single mothers who raise their children in father-absent homes, perpetuating and compounding the original problem. And the wheel keeps on turnin'.</p>
<p>Name the problem and it's almost a certainty that kids from father-absent homes are significantly more at risk for it. Even though the above litany was meant to be mind-boggling, consider that I had to be selective. Newspapers don't give me enough space to do more than scratch the surface.</p>
<p>But here's something that's not often talked about: Children of unmarried, cohabiting parents are at higher risk for most of these same problems as well. That means the real problem isn't so much the absence of a father in the life of a child; it's the absence of a husband. More specifically, it's the absence of a marriage..."</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nomblog.com/21940/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Critics Say Tax System Partially to Blame for Number of Single Parents</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/17779</link>
		<comments>http://www.nomblog.com/17779#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NOM Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=17779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK Christian Institute: More British children are being raised by single parents because the tax and benefit system “encourages transient shack-ups”. One in five British children live with a single mother or father. This figure is some 35 per cent higher than in Germany and 50 per cent higher than in France. Researcher and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.christian.org.uk/news/critics-blame-tax-system-for-number-of-single-parents/" target="_blank"><em>The UK Christian Institute</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>More British children are being raised by single parents because the tax and benefit system “encourages transient shack-ups”.</p>
<p>One in five British children live with a single mother or father. This figure is some 35 per cent higher than in Germany and 50 per cent higher than in France.</p>
<p>Researcher and author Patricia Morgan points out that these are the countries whose tax and benefits systems reward parents who stay together.</p>
<p>She said: “You can look at these figures and see immediately which countries help couples through tax and benefits.</p>
<p>“In France, people get help if they draw up legal family contracts. In Germany, Holland and Italy, married people get tax relief and tax relief for children.”</p>
<p>She added: “By contrast, our system encourages transient shack-ups.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nomblog.com/17779/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;I&#039;ve Failed My Children by Refusing to Marry Their Father, Even Though They Begged Me To&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/13990</link>
		<comments>http://www.nomblog.com/13990#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NOM Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=13990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louise Greenfield puts a human face on the cohabitation epidemic in the UK Daily Mail: "...we were like an increasing number of middle-class couples who co-habit, have children and see no reason to formalise their shared commitment to a lifelong future with a wedding ceremony. And yet, it seems it wasn’t enough. Because despite all [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louise Greenfield puts a human face on the cohabitation epidemic in the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2037552/Like-habitees-Louise-dismissed-marriage-just-piece-paper-Now-admits-wouldve-kept-family-falling-apart.html?printingPage=true" target="_blank"><em>UK Daily Mail</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"...we were like an increasing number of middle-class couples who co-habit, have children and see no reason to formalise their shared commitment to a lifelong future with a wedding ceremony.</p>
<p>And yet, it seems it wasn’t enough. Because despite all those years together, and all those children, David and I are now in the process of splitting up. We are divorcing without ever having married.</p>
<p>..herein lies an uncomfortable thought. While it pains me to say so, I can’t help thinking that our situation might have been different if we’d got married.</p>
<p>For years, I told myself — and others — that marriage for me was just a word, a formality, and that David and I were as close as any married couple. Now I’m not so sure. Maybe, if we had made a proper commitment in front of our friends and loved ones, if we had said those binding, meaningful words, we might not be in this situation.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nomblog.com/13990/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
