Comments on: Jon Rauch Defends Prop 8 Expert Witness David Blankenhorn http://www.nomblog.com/975/ The official blog of the National Organization for Marriage Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:12:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: ConservativeNY http://www.nomblog.com/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17518 ConservativeNY Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:45:57 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=975#comment-17518 Only if you are referring to the Virgin Mary, Anon. Only if you are referring to the Virgin Mary, Anon.

]]> By: TC Matthews http://www.nomblog.com/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17514 TC Matthews Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:12:26 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=975#comment-17514 Anon, ?????? Anon, ??????

]]> By: Anon http://www.nomblog.com/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17484 Anon Sun, 20 Jun 2010 03:58:14 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=975#comment-17484 I have a policy against responding to comments. Especially those that are not related to the article. But, Adam doesn't understand this: As long as there is one woman, procreation is possible. No sperm is needed. A single woman can get herself pregnant. Japanese biologists have PROVEN this. I have a policy against responding to comments. Especially those that are not related to the article.
But, Adam doesn't understand this:

As long as there is one woman, procreation is possible. No sperm is needed. A single woman can get herself pregnant. Japanese biologists have PROVEN this.

]]> By: Adam http://www.nomblog.com/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17353 Adam Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:56:03 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=975#comment-17353 The judge call it like it is. The people can vote rationally on gay marriage. "And why is that difference not one the Legislature or voters could rationally take into account in setting the marriage laws in California?" The judge call it like it is. The people can vote rationally on gay marriage.
"And why is that difference not one the Legislature or voters could rationally take into account in setting the marriage laws in California?"

]]> By: Adam http://www.nomblog.com/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17352 Adam Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:54:59 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=975#comment-17352 The judge gets it: Judge Walker pressed Olson on the point. "They have identified a difference between opposite-sex and same-sex couples in that opposite-sex couples can procreate without the benefit of a third party. That is a difference," Walker said. "And why is that difference not one the Legislature or voters could rationally take into account in setting the marriage laws in California?" So hmm. there is a difference after all. Sheesh I was almost thinking that all this talk of procreation was silly. Imagine gays lesbians are just as equal arent they? They can have kids of course! WITH THE BENEFIT OF A 3RD PARTY! The judge gets it:
Judge Walker pressed Olson on the point.

"They have identified a difference between opposite-sex and same-sex couples in that opposite-sex couples can procreate without the benefit of a third party. That is a difference," Walker said. "And why is that difference not one the Legislature or voters could rationally take into account in setting the marriage laws in California?"

So hmm. there is a difference after all. Sheesh I was almost thinking that all this talk of procreation was silly. Imagine gays lesbians are just as equal arent they? They can have kids of course! WITH THE BENEFIT OF A 3RD PARTY!

]]>