Dear Friends of Marriage,
A vote for Elana Kagan is a vote to impose gay marriage on all 50 states.
Don't be fooled, Pres. Obama today has nominated a radical justice who will vote to overturn Prop 8 in California, the federal Defense of Marriage Act and the laws protecting marriage in all 50 states.
NOM has reviewed her record, and today we told the press. "A vote for Elana Kagan will be a vote for imposing gay marriage on all 50 states."
How do we know? For one thing, as Solicitor General, Elena Kagan has sabotaged the legal case for upholding the federal Defense of Marriage Act.
Kagan's brief before the federal courts on DOMA attacked the main legal rationale for marriage, that it is related to responsible procreation.
Her apparent "defense" of DOMA was designed to -- and in fact will -- undermine the law in federal courts, paving the way for a federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Some people have pointed to a statement she made during the confirmation process for Solicitor General as evidence she opposes a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. The context of that statement makes clear she was not describing her own views, but the state of the existing law. Claims that somehow Kagan is "moderate" on gay marriage are part of a PR campaign intended to mislead the public about her core Constitutional values.
If you need any other assurance that Kagan is a vote for stripping Americans of our right to vote for marriage, listen to the Joe Solmonese of the Human Rights Campaign, the richest and most influential gay rights organization in the country:
“We applaud President Obama for choosing Elena Kagan to become our nation’s next U.S. Supreme Court Justice . . . We are confident that Elena Kagan has a demonstrated understanding and commitment to protecting the liberty and equality of all Americans, including LGBT Americans," as Solmonese went on to specifically cite the need for justices committed to LGBT issues on federal cases related to "marriage equality."
TAKE ACTION TODAY!
Click here to send a mesage to the members of the Senate Judiciary, and to the Senators from your own state. Tell them to vote NO on Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court.
A vote for Kagan is a vote to strip all Americans
of our right to vote for marriage as one man and one woman.
Tell your Senators to vote NO today!
TELL A FRIEND!
The only way to win this fight is if we all join together to make our voices heard in Washington. After you've told your Senators you don't want a radical same-sex marriage supporter on the Supreme Court, please spread the word to your friends and family.
What can you do? Forward this email . . . post on Facebook . . . retweet on Twitter . . . do whatever you can do to get the word out. You know your friends and social networks. Please do whatever it takes to get your friends to take action today!
Brian S. BrownPresident
National Organization for Marriage
20 Nassau Street, Suite 242
Princeton, NJ 08542
bbrown@nationformarriage.org
5 Comments
It's time to give up. Your intolerance is horrible. Let people live happy, gratifying lives for ONCE.
Joe, NOM's mission is to let people live happy lives. People shouldn't base their happiness off one thing in life. Marriage won't solve your problems. Its better to be happy and single than married and miserable. Marriage doesn't doesn't make happiness.
You want a happy life, go out and make it.
Dear Brian Brown (and all those who are working with NOM)
I want to personally thank you for all of your devotion, dedication and hard work to this important issue. I want to encourage you to keep up the fight! I will keep you in my prayers and I know how difficult this fight can be. Please keep up your effort and know that your labor is not in vain. May the Lord richly bless you and may he give you success in all that you do in His name.
Brandon
DEAR ADAM: So heterosexual couples can secure 1,138 legal benefits, protections, and responsibilities as soon as they marry (regardless of their religion, their desire whether or not to have children, or their ability to simply "go out and make a happy life" on their own) .... but Gay couples have to be held to a different standard? Sorry, it's not Constitutional.
under your logic Chuck, ANY random grouping of people animals or things could also be considered "couples". Are you open to three man "marriages"? Why only two? How about two women and a man? Don't they love each other too? Or is there some component to marriage that you refuse to acknowledge here?
The constitution has no problem with marriage law. It applies equally to everyone. No one, regardless of orientation, may be barred from marrying within the law. You may not like the law, but you cannot complain it is unfair. The law applies to you and I with perfect equality.