PA Rep. Metcalfe Introduces Marriage Amendment


From Pennsylvania House State Government Committee Chairman (and State Representative) Daryl Metcalfe's official press release:

[We] announced today the introduction of a Constitutional amendment to allow the citizens of Pennsylvania to precisely define marriage as a union between one man and one woman.“The institution of traditional marriage has never been under greater attack,” said Metcalfe.  “This not only includes the special interests who want to permanently redefine marriage, but unfortunately the executive branch and the federal Department of Justice who have blatantly and recklessly refused to uphold and defend its Constitutionality.  Once again, it falls to the responsibility of state lawmakers to restore the rule of law and carry out the will of the people.”

Once House Bill 1434 is approved in two consecutive sessions of the General Assembly, Pennsylvanians would then have the choice, through voter referendum, to amend the state Constitution to include a provision containing the following language:

“Marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife and no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized.”

The language contained in Metcalfe’s legislation is modeled after Florida’s marriage protection amendment, which was approved by more than 60 percent of Florida voters in 2008. The amendment was also unanimously ruled Constitutional by the Florida Supreme Court, after being challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

To date, voters in 30 states have ratified similar amendments to their state constitutions.

“Pennsylvania voters deserve the opportunity to do the same,” Metcalfe said. “The definition of marriage as ‘the union of one man and one woman,’ defended and upheld by this legislation, is the traditional definition of marriage that has been recognized and accepted throughout history and the world for centuries. It should not be the Obama administration’s Department of Justice and the executive branch bureaucrats that decide this critical issue for our Commonwealth, but rather the voters.”

More progress!


  1. SC Guy
    Posted May 6, 2011 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    I hope that we can get this to a vote in Pennsylvania. Does anyone know if the GOP leadership in the PA Legislature is going to give this a fair hearing?

  2. John N.
    Posted May 6, 2011 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Way to go to the great state of PA. Let us fight to let the people vote. I have visited the Poconos and love the decent people of PA. The will of the people needed to restore order.

  3. John Noe
    Posted May 7, 2011 at 12:47 am | Permalink

    So the Florida amendment was challenged by the ACLU and lost. The ACLU should be known as the anti civil liberties Union. They do what they can to undermine our civil liberties.

    (1) The demand that SSM is a right and the phony right demanding societys approval. You have no civil right to someone else's approval. When you demand someone else's approval you have taken my civil right away to judge what is right and wrong.

    (2) The ACLU claims we do not have a civil right to vote on matters. They attack our civil right to vote.

    (3) The Boy Scouts are a private organization. A basic civil liberty is when a private organization determines right from wrong and who may join. The ACLU infringes our most basic civil right and liberties on private property when they demand that is has to allow in homosexuals.

    I could go on but I think you get the picture.