<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TAKE ACTION: Bennett Amendment Defeated in Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nomblog.com/823/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nomblog.com/823/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the National Organization for Marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/823/comment-page-1/#comment-16539</link>
		<dc:creator>TC Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=823#comment-16539</guid>
		<description>Richard, you have the right, you don&#039;t have to use it.  Some people do, some people don&#039;t.  That&#039;s your choice.  Your argument rests on the idea that you are denied a right.  You are not denied a right.  Like it or not, we all have the same rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, you have the right, you don't have to use it.  Some people do, some people don't.  That's your choice.  Your argument rests on the idea that you are denied a right.  You are not denied a right.  Like it or not, we all have the same rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Cortijo</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/823/comment-page-1/#comment-16536</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cortijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=823#comment-16536</guid>
		<description>TC so, if I am reading this correctly you would recommend that a Gay man or woman marry someone from the opposite sex regardless of love just to satisfy YOUR (or someone elses) beliefs?  Curious, who wins and loses in this scenerio?  hmmm  father leaves after having children to pursue his real love after maybe 15 years leaving the mother without a partner, robbing her of finder her true love for life?  Or breaking up the family leaving the kids in a single parent household?  Maybe, just maybe the better thing to do is let adults marry adults whom they truly love and let that relationship grow into a true committed loving family without lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TC so, if I am reading this correctly you would recommend that a Gay man or woman marry someone from the opposite sex regardless of love just to satisfy YOUR (or someone elses) beliefs?  Curious, who wins and loses in this scenerio?  hmmm  father leaves after having children to pursue his real love after maybe 15 years leaving the mother without a partner, robbing her of finder her true love for life?  Or breaking up the family leaving the kids in a single parent household?  Maybe, just maybe the better thing to do is let adults marry adults whom they truly love and let that relationship grow into a true committed loving family without lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/823/comment-page-1/#comment-16524</link>
		<dc:creator>TC Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=823#comment-16524</guid>
		<description>Ben, this isn&#039;t about your ability to marry.  You already have that.  It&#039;s not about Christians, or heathens, gays or straights, it&#039;s simply about the definition of marriage.  Marriage is between a man and a woman, for reasons independent of your classifications.  You and I have the same right to marry, regardless of your real, actual, or perceived orientation or sexual habits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, this isn't about your ability to marry.  You already have that.  It's not about Christians, or heathens, gays or straights, it's simply about the definition of marriage.  Marriage is between a man and a woman, for reasons independent of your classifications.  You and I have the same right to marry, regardless of your real, actual, or perceived orientation or sexual habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/823/comment-page-1/#comment-16519</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=823#comment-16519</guid>
		<description>I really can&#039;t get my head around the concept of your entitlement to decide someone Else&#039;s marriage, don&#039;t you honestly have nothing better to do? Have a little empathy and try to imagine this, if the roles were reversed and we were voting on Christians ability to marry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can't get my head around the concept of your entitlement to decide someone Else's marriage, don't you honestly have nothing better to do? Have a little empathy and try to imagine this, if the roles were reversed and we were voting on Christians ability to marry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/823/comment-page-1/#comment-16465</link>
		<dc:creator>mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=823#comment-16465</guid>
		<description>This is unfortunate. DC should have the right to vote on this issue. Residents always call their home the land of taxation with out representation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unfortunate. DC should have the right to vote on this issue. Residents always call their home the land of taxation with out representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

