NOM BLOG

Bennett DC marriage amendment defeated in Senate last night

 

Early this morning, during "vote-o-rama," the Senate voted 59-36 to block the Bennett Amendment on DC Marriage Referendum that would have guaranteed DC residents the right to vote on same-sex marriage. Democrats voted as block to defeat all amendments to the health care reconciliation bill. With the exception of Senators Collins and Snowe of Maine, all Republicans present supported the rights of DC residents to vote on same-sex marriage. Five senators were absent for the late-night vote occurring shortly after 1am.  

Details here.

8 Comments

  1. Mark Thoma
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    What did nation for marriage expect? You just cant vote on peoples civil rights. Especially not a minorities. Sorry!

  2. fundie
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Is it possible for the Senate to show any more contempt for the voters?

  3. mac
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    I will be sending money to NOM. I will work to stop progressives from turning th USA into California. Fenty in DC is closing 81 schools yet has time to push Gay agendas.

  4. TC Matthews
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Mark Thoma, special rights are not civil rights.

  5. ConservativeNY
    Posted March 27, 2010 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

    "What did nation for marriage expect? You just cant vote on peoples civil rights. Especially not a minorities. Sorry!"

    Then why did the DC City Council vote on it? Why was any vote allowed at all if that were the case? Face it, the DC Charter was bypassed to allow only the votes that would turn out in the favor of those running the DC government. That is corrupt and illegal and will be overturned.

    Minorities do not have the power to invent new rights for themselves that are found nowhere in the Constitution.

  6. Existing Right
    Posted March 27, 2010 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    The Supreme Court has ruled numerous times that marriage is a fundamental right. Interracial marriages were not described anywhere in the constitution either. The fact that the right to marry excluding some but allowing others is the problem with your argumentation. Its an easy argument to make, that since folks are not excluded they must be treated equally under the law and not be targets of discrimination and hate.

  7. TC Matthews
    Posted March 28, 2010 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    Marriage has been ruled a fundamental right, you're correct. You friend, have every right that I have to marry, regardless of sexual orientation. What is NOT recognized as a fundamental right is to marry whomever, whatever, or any group of whomever whatevers. Marriage is between a man and a woman.

  8. ConservativeNY
    Posted March 28, 2010 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    The government does not recognize every desire people have as a right. Current marriage rules apply equally to everyone already. We all have the same right to marry any qualified person from the opposite sex.