Homosexual men are still, nearly 30 years later, the greatest contributors to the AIDS epidemic in this country. Not to mention syphilis, gonorrhea, hepatitis, etc. Really healthy lifestyle. Something that we should endorse, encourage and promote through the farce of homosexual "marriage."

If you are a heterosexual supporting homosexual "marriage", you are either out of your mind or you are being handsomly paid for your support.

"I’m sorry. I don’t follow your logic,  The law doesn’t believe in God, Not all Christians believe in God, ergo, I hate gays?"

So you assert that you have to believe that gays are immoral to believe in God?  Your way or the highway? 

Again, your religious viewpoints are, well, are yours. They have absolutely nothing to do with civil law. 

This statement of yours says volumes.

"Some people who experience same sex attraction identify so completely with their moral ideas and actions that they say they “ARE” their moral choices. I don’t find that to be an accurate description."

love the sinner not the sin is not acceptable, and still has nothing to do with civic law.

I'm sorry. I don't follow your logic.
The law doesn't believe in God
Not all Christians believe in God
ergo
I hate gays?

I think you are confused on several levels. In the eyes of the law, gays are not deemed immoral. In fact, not all christians believe gays are immoral. So you are wrong to assert that this isn't a fight against people, you very well intend to target gays as less than worthy of rights afforded to others.

The intent to defame is quite evident in the postings here. If I were to use Samantha's logic, every "Girls Gone Crazy" video is evidence that all woman are promiscuous women.

Judge in Gay Marriage Case: Ability to Procreate Not Required

The battle over California’s gay marriage ban is set to continue at least through January.

The WSJ’s Geoffrey Fowler reports that today in San Francisco, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker refused to grant a motion from backers of the ban, known as Prop. 8, to throw out a constitutional challenge to it filed earlier this year.
-------

There goes that whole, "it's all about making babies" argument.

I can understand insecure homosexuals, living in their own make-belief world, desperately trying to prove that they are just like everybody else. For them, their homosexuality is the essence of their existence. They do not care about the social consequences of their annihilistic and hedonistic crusade. They do not care about the kids who are deprived of a mom or dad from the start. They do not care about the mixed messages sent to our children about sexuality and about the importance of having a mom AND a dad. In fact, a complete transformation of our world in accordance with their own hedonistic and annihilistic vision is their ultimate goal.

If the AIDS epidemic, which originated from homosexual activity, did not open people's eyes, what is it going to take? The annihilation of the entire human race -- just because we are too stupid/politically correct to say enough is enough?

Wouldn't it be better to allow adults the freedom to be with who they choose to and pursue the missing legal advantages separate from marriage? Colorado has recently adopted a plan I think is quite a good one. It gives benefits to any significant relationship between adults living in the same home. It could be a grandmother living with her college age granddaughter, or two lesbians, or three elderly sisters. It gives government protection and encouragement not because of the potential for the creation of children, but because of the stability created when people have loving charge over one another. Utah has a similar law. I hope it spreads because committed people deserve rights and privileges. That's a cause I can get behind.