The arbitrary restrictions against our civil liberties have begun.

To be precise, some straight people are immoral. I wonder how many sexual partners David in Houston has had.

I have long argued that marriage law should be designed to protect innocent women in their relationships with men behaving badly. Note that every example David cites is a man behaving badly.

At least they aren't suing to make adultery morally acceptable or printing adultery pride t-shirts.

The seedy side of homosexuality is what they try to conceal and what we need to publically expose, loudly, and often.

http://americansfortruth.com/2012/06/21/philadelphia-gay-pride-parade-and-festival-feature-lewd-acts-porn-booth-sadomasochists/#more-11937

Sorry, David. Morality and normality don't change just because leftists decide to redefine the terms. Lots of kids these days are labeled "ADD" or "ADHD" or "autistic," but no one calls them normal because their parents want to help them; by their own standards, these kids will tell you that they are normal.

Similarly, homosexuals have decided that they want to embrace their mental disorder and so, through infiltration of psychological organizations, have managed to have the term "normal" redefined. When my aunt lost her mind to Alzheimer's, she thought she was normal too, ha, ha.

Those of is who have the clarity of mind to recognize what normal is - and using one's reproductive organs for bizarre same-sex recreation is not - know that homosexuality (and Alzheimer's) is a mental disorder. The inmates have taken over the asylum.

The 1950's called. They don't want you using their outdated ignorant rhetoric anymore. Homosexuality is part of the normal spectrum of human sexuality. We've known that for decades.

Here's a clue: Straight people are immoral. Sexual orientation doesn't determine a person's morality. Do the names Newt Gingrich, Gov. Sanford, Tiger Woods, Eliot Spitzer, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Herman Cain, John Edwards, David Petraeus, and on and on.

Ironically, the worldwide norm is to look down on (and distance oneself from) what they do, probably half the reason people think supporting the redefinition of marriage is the compassionate thing to do.

I hope they don't sue me now, now that I've published that I neither agree with, nor support, their litigiousness.

The homosexual special rights movement: Changing society one lawsuit at a time.
(Or was that several dozen lawsuits at a time.)

Lovely.

Tolerance is about accepting or putting up with different points of view, it doesn't mean you have to agree without question nor comply with them.

The fight for same-sex marriage was never about rights. If that were true then they would accept Civil Unions which in states like California grant ALL the same benefits/protections. This is about destroying our religious institutions. The left cries out about "separation of church and state" when a church gets involved with our culture, but are perfectly fine when a business owner who has religious faith is forced to violate his/her conscience.

Better yet, a shirt that says, "If you're Muslim, kill a homosexual." Then they'll really be torn.