After SSM, What Next? Mark Steyn on "Happy Triples" in Toronto Grade Schools
September 24, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Mark Steyn in National Review:
A few years ago, when the gay-marriage bandwagon got rolling, some of us argued that “if the sex of the participants is no longer relevant, why should the number be?” The same-sex-marriage crowd swatted the polygamy shtick aside as utterly irrelevant, even though there are far more takers for polygamy than there will ever be for gay marriage, and it is, de facto, already recognized to one degree or another by multiculti types in the British Government pensions department and the French welfare system.
So here we are in 2012, and the Toronto District School Board has a new poster called “Love Has No Gender“, full of happy couples but also happy triples. This poster is in every Toronto grade school.
22 Comments
The hand of homofascism has opened a pandora's box of sexual perversion. The rejection of sexual sanity is what started Sodom and Gomorrah.
These miscreants are out to abolish everything that leaves them with a sense of guilt for their immoral behavior. When one considers the fact that guilt is manifested from within it should be quite clear to everyone that there will be no end to this assault on our freedom.
These are drowning victims who have no qualms whatsoever with taking you down with them.
lol, you a crazy fool!
Agree, Mantronik. Sexual perversion is nothing new, but it is truly remarkable that civilized society has recognized it for the danger it is for thousands of years up until now.
We should be trying to cure sexual perversions, not celebrate them, be it homosexuality, porn addiction, pedophilia, sexual self-mutilation, sex addiction, sexual confusion, etc....
As previously stated: LGBT-BIP.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual, Transgender – Bestiality, Incest, Pedophile.
Or abbreviated as “The Qs”. (Wherein the “s” stands for the plural form of Q, and not at all for “The Queer Sickos” for that is understandably prejudiced.)
What did it take? 2, 3... 4 or more percent of the population having same-sex relations to deem it legitimate to publicize, commercialize, encourage and promote it in the public square for the benefit of the participants (and the commercial world)? So what do are statistics tell us about incest? That a hire percentage of the population has experienced it, and has been attracted to it, than has experienced LGBT activity? Now lets stop making all those people feel uncomfortable about their eventual experiences - “Incest Pride 2013”. And lets see where we'll be after 20 years of progress and the educational elimination of bigotry (or rather, of a healthy taboo) toward the subject.
Again. Multiple opposite-sex marriages : polygamist-marriages, do not fall into the above category. Their acceptance or non acceptance in a society is a subject apart from the above, and apart from the core definition of marriage which it a union between the opposite-sexes. But of course the happy identities above are going to pervert, I mean change, the meaning of polygamist-marriages, by enlightening us on the possibilities of it being the attraction to the group sex, and or bisexual group sex, and the psychological makeup within this group-union that defines the love in the union. And thus their civil right.
“Love...” Love, children. That is what matters. That's all that matters. “But what is love Miss Darik?” “Its what you feel when you're desiring sex. Or something very close to that. Now go run along and playing with your toys little Timmy, it will soon be snack-time for the whole class.”
__________
Now I know this is all hard and unpleasant stuff being posted here at NOM Blog. That it is of questionable interest of any kind. And really, really – it should not be done so. But! But look what their posting in school classrooms!
Insanity breads insanity, or more correctly put, the learning and thinking of unhelpful things leads to unhelpful actions. And in this case, reaction.
Which brings us back to the question raised at the beginning of this very long unending day: what kind of a society is it that we want to create for ourselves anyway?
@OvercameSSA Thanks. Are you aware of heteroseparatist.com ?
Love has no gender? So only genderless people (whatever the heck that is) can love or marry?
No wonder children are confused. We'll have a lot more Questioning children to add to the LGBTQ group.
Please make everyone aware just how shameful and wrong sodomy, homosexuality is! It's time to tell the truth!
I wasn't aware "wheelchair" was a gender.
"I wasn't aware "wheelchair" was a gender."
Barb wins the top comment award.
I would also add the use of the word "gender" as opposed to "sex" is meant to replace concrete realities for fluid constructs.
The world has only two sexes; male and female. Using gender to replace sex is a way to get around that reality.
Which of those couples are the loving siblings? The mom & son? Dad & daughter?
Love has no gender is translatted to say that we have no gender. This is the homosexual and transsexual trap. Rejecting our genders and claiming their is no male or female.
“... we have no gender... there is no male or female. This is the homosexual and transsexual trap.” And more so, it is the Feminists long standing goal. One that has since been taken up by the medical, pharmaceutical and commercial world.
(It is high time that feminist organizations be made to disband.)
So you admit that you were arguing in favor of polygamy, then?
Makes sense. That IS traditional marriage.
"The world has only two sexes; male and female."
That's not true, people who are born otherwise most certainly exist.
What do you do with this fact--and it is a fact?
@Mantronikk: "The rejection of sexual sanity is what started Sodom and Gomorrah."
Oh really? Kinda funny that you say that, considering that it's not even in the story... Was there a director's cut I missed?
Especially funny when you consider that, not only does that not happen in the story, the darn thing is actually explained in the Bible:
"Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy."
-Ezekiel 16:49
Pat, Ezekiel tells only part of the story: Jude (KJV) 1:7-8 tells us more of the state of the citizens of Sodom:
"Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh [homosexuality], are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities."
Interestingly enough, Peter (KJV) uses Sodom and Gomorrha and their destruction due to ungodliness, to spell out what makes one "ungodly." It's an interesting read: 2 Peter 2: 6-22.
There are quite a few other references to Sodom throughout both the N.T. and the O.T.
"Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy."
Whoops, you forgot the very next verse: "They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen."
The male homosexuals banged on Lot's door and demanded to have sex with the two male visitors inside. Then, as homosexuals do when they get angry, they became violent.
See also Jude 7: "In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire."
Pat loves genderless falsehoods.
If the gender is irrelevant to sexual love, then, a gay man would not claim to feel sexual attraction for men only. No case could be made by a gay woman for her to object to the bride-groom requirement of marital love if it was true that marital love is gender-blind. There would be no possible basis for transexualization of human bodies if self-love was genderless.
There types of love that by human nautre are not sexual. But genderless?
The genderless nonsese seems blatantly anti-human.,
Nice to see that Toronto isn't afraid of equality.
The idiotic poster is an example of the fear of these meddlers to be anything but intellectually honest.
And that sure is not a good trait for those delegated responsibility to educate. Stpider and stupider.