The child was abandoned by his mother - pre-emptively - and will learn that was willed by himself and his male sexual accomplice.
There was no child in need whose interest could plausibly be best served by adoption. The child would not have been concieved if noy for the provider of a service,a woman who sold her body as surrogate, a woman who gave up her own child via her giving up her gamtes, and two men who sought to use people in this manner to attain possession of a vulnerable and innocent human being. The transaction was not centered on this particular child but on the means of achieving an immoral end. Ultimately this was about using a child to satisify needy adults all round.

So, yes,it is heartless to knowingly do this to children. This child will have been denied his birthright. It is an example of adults manufacturing a tragedy or misfortune and recognizing that something is amiss ... by anticipating the child's perspective.

At least Elton John voiced the brokeness if what has been done to this child.

But it is not just a point of empathy. It is a point of procreative justice. So Elton John needed to acknowledge his part in this.

The motherless circumstance will break the child'sheart, he said.

Not quite right. Elton John and his accomplice will break this child'sheart.

And will do it again to another child, anyway.

That willfulness to do a moral wrong is the missing part of Elton John's admission. This is his half-hearted confession. He'd excuse breaking the hearts of children. Why wish such hardship on children?

Society has the right to discriminate from what is good and what is bad, period. Marriage and Parenting works well as is and does not need an addition. Individuals can do as they please as long as their behavior does not affect the rest of us who disagrees with their choices in life. And, if laws are needed to make sure this does not happen, so be it!

Of course not; because they have not been around long enough to know the difference.

My experience with this same subject is that the children brought up in this environment demonstrate extreme gender confusion; while the same-gender sex addicts that raise them diligently work at encouraging these children to pursue the same type of relationship they have. Just watching this anyone can see that these adults are looking for vindication through the children they should be protecting.

It is heartbreaking to see, but the government is on their side - for now.

That's nothing more than anecdotal, but it's worth mentioning.

But here's the actually relevant comment: The Furnish-John kid is less than two years old; no one can possibly claim to know what is going to break his heart, or not.

Let's all check in with Zachary in a decade or two and see what's what.

Elton John is not a mind reader. And neither are you. Any of you. (Nor I).

It must be hard to grow up in that kind of environment and the parents don't expect you to experience any sort of hurt from being created and raised in that fashion. They don’t expect you to feel that there is something unnatural about your “family.” Any expression of hurt or even bewilderment about your origins is suppressed by a child fearful of their parents, or concerned about their parents' emotional well-being.

Imagine children who grow up and their parents have no empathy for them, and don't even try to understand their pain. The children are really supposed to assume that they resulted from two men, and deal with realizing that this isn’t true and the aftermath on their own. In fact, the aftermath is the fault of a homophobic society—not what the parents brought the child into.

Elton is willing to inflict pain on another child, but at least he acknowledges it. Cold comfort for the child, I’m sure.

So that when I tell my child, "I'm looking forward to you being married one day" it will actually mean what I'm looking forward to.

Also, I find Elton's admission meaningless, since he plans to break another child's heart.

Children are not pets.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1342346/Elton-Johns-baby-2-mothers-required-produce-heir.html

The kid will just get another "parent," and will, as the homosexualist researchers like to say, "do fine," As long as he gets a college education and a good job (or inherits a bunch of cash), he's "doing fine," as those seem to be the libs basis on which to determine how good one's life is.

All that mom and dad stuff is irrelevant; nothing that 5-days a week of therapy can't solve.

It is all about you Elton; you go boy!

I guess heartbreak and confusion is the price children have to pay for adult satisfaction.

***And while we're at it, let's subject another child to this so that Zachary will have a sibling! They'll share the same mother (egg donor), but we'll mix sperm so that they won't know which one of us is "the" dad, or which child descended from which man.***

The games they play with children's lives...