<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CP: Kirk Cameron Named &#039;Champion of Marriage&#039; in New Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nomblog.com/25476/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nomblog.com/25476</link>
	<description>The official blog of the National Organization for Marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daughter of Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/25476/comment-page-1#comment-120562</link>
		<dc:creator>Daughter of Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=25476#comment-120562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstinence, then marriage (naturally between a man and a woman), followed by monogamy, and then childbearing, is the model which does the most good, for the most number of people, and is the only standard to hold up to society.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abstinence, then marriage (naturally between a man and a woman), followed by monogamy, and then childbearing, is the model which does the most good, for the most number of people, and is the only standard to hold up to society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AM</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/25476/comment-page-1#comment-120552</link>
		<dc:creator>AM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=25476#comment-120552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I&#039;m not advocating for it, but I sure wouldn&#039;t mind the moderator deleting brainless comments like #1.&quot;

Lol. Like.
 :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I'm not advocating for it, but I sure wouldn't mind the moderator deleting brainless comments like #1."</p>
<p>Lol. Like.<br />
 <img src='http://cdn.nomblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/25476/comment-page-1#comment-120540</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=25476#comment-120540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, Andy King, let me translate and explain the title of the blog post for you.

&quot;CP: Kirk Cameron Named &#039;Champion of Marriage&#039; in New Video.&quot;

What does that mean as posted on the NOM Blog? It means that Christian Post is reporting that NOM named Kirk a marriage champion in their video, and that NOM is sharing the Christian Post&#039;s reporting of the story with us.

Your &quot;I&#039;m keeping NOM honest&quot; moment was an embarrassing display of noting the obvious.

I&#039;m not advocating for it, but I sure wouldn&#039;t mind the moderator deleting brainless comments like #1. 

The only drawback would be that Andy would think he was censored because he exposed a &quot;lie&quot; from NOM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Andy King, let me translate and explain the title of the blog post for you.</p>
<p>"CP: Kirk Cameron Named 'Champion of Marriage' in New Video."</p>
<p>What does that mean as posted on the NOM Blog? It means that Christian Post is reporting that NOM named Kirk a marriage champion in their video, and that NOM is sharing the Christian Post's reporting of the story with us.</p>
<p>Your "I'm keeping NOM honest" moment was an embarrassing display of noting the obvious.</p>
<p>I'm not advocating for it, but I sure wouldn't mind the moderator deleting brainless comments like #1. </p>
<p>The only drawback would be that Andy would think he was censored because he exposed a "lie" from NOM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/25476/comment-page-1#comment-120360</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=25476#comment-120360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just finished the video. Nothing Cameron said was inflammatory. In fact, I think that his guidance to heterosexual couples might be of some value to those who share his Christian background.

However, his views on what should be the &quot;model&quot; should not be mandatory on everyone, especially in a world with so many different cultures and types of people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished the video. Nothing Cameron said was inflammatory. In fact, I think that his guidance to heterosexual couples might be of some value to those who share his Christian background.</p>
<p>However, his views on what should be the "model" should not be mandatory on everyone, especially in a world with so many different cultures and types of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy King</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/25476/comment-page-1#comment-120354</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=25476#comment-120354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh, The Christian Post didn&#039;t call Kirk Cameron a &quot;champion of marriage&quot;. They reported that YOU called him that.

You are still the only one calling him that, as far as I&#039;m aware.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, The Christian Post didn't call Kirk Cameron a "champion of marriage". They reported that YOU called him that.</p>
<p>You are still the only one calling him that, as far as I'm aware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
