Deseret News: Studies Challenge Widely Held Assumptions About Same-Sex Parenting


Lois Collins at Deseret News reports on the new studies by Prof. Regnerus at Prof. Marks:

The oft-cited assertion that there are "no differences" in outcomes between children of same-sex parent households and those of intact biological families may not be accurate, according to a new study published today in the journal Social Science Research.

Adult children of parents who have been in same-sex relationships are different than children raised in intact biological families on a number of social, emotional and relationship measures, according to research from the University of Texas at Austin.

Among other things, they reported lower income levels, poorer mental and physical health and more troubled current romantic relationships. The study found 25 differences across 40 measures.

The research does not address why the differences exist. It doesn't predict if changing attitudes that are more accepting of same-sex relationships will mean that children growing up today with same-sex parents will one day fare better in similar analysis. It doesn't address stigma or whether the difference is not the sexual preference of the parents but rather how stable the home life was, lead investigator Mark Regnerus, associate professor of sociology at University of Texas Austin's Population Research Center, told the Deseret News.

"Nor does the study tell us that same-sex parents are necessarily bad parents," he said in a written statement. "Rather, family forms that are associated with instability or non-biological parents tend to pose risks for children as they age into adulthood."

His study does challenge long-held assertions that there are no outcome differences between children raised in intact biological families and those with same-sex parents.

The editorial board of Deseret has separately published a statement -- "In our opinion: Family structure counts".

One Comment

  1. Fitz
    Posted June 12, 2012 at 11:05 pm | Permalink


    Why do I need to do your research for you? NOM's very inception was created to defend the traditional understanding of marriage in law & culture.. Not to role back no-fault divorce.

    Having said that it is a simple matter of fact that its board members and founders have spent decades defending marriage against divorce, out-of-wedlock childbearing, and the like.

    This is all a matter of public record and you should have no problem finding the writings of Maggie Gallagher and Robert George and the others when it comes to speaking publicly about marriage...all well before the very idea of gay "marriage" ever hit the public conciousness.

Comments are temporarily disabled. Please try back later.