NOM BLOG

Wedding Photographer May Be Required (on Pain of Legal Liability) to Photograph Same-Sex Commitment Ceremonies

 

Eugene Volokh's legal experts blog:

"So the New Mexico Court of Appeals held last week in the long-pending Elane Photography v. Willock (N.M. Ct. App. May 31, 2012). The court began by holding that the state law that bans sexual orientation discrimination in places of public accommodation applies to professional wedding photographers’ decisions not to photograph same-sex commitment ceremonies: Such photography businesses are “places of public accommodation” under the language of the law, and the discrimination between legally recognized opposite-sex marriages (New Mexico only recognizes such marriages) and same-sex commitment ceremonies constitutes discrimination based on sexual orientation.

The court then rejected the argument of the photographer (Elane Huguenin, the co-owner and principal photographer for Elane Photography) that penalizing her for not photographing such same-sex ceremonies was an unconstitutional “speech compulsion.” The First Amendment, Huguenin argued, has been repeatedly held to protect the right to speak as well as the right not to speak; and the right not to speak includes the right not to create artistic expression that one doesn’t want to create. And just as the First Amendment protects speech that is said for money (indeed, most books, newspapers, movies, and the like are created and distributed commercially), so it protects the right not to create certain artistic works for money, even if one is in that line of business. But the court disagreed..."

11 Comments

  1. OvercameSSA
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    I know how I'd handle this one if I were the photographer: take lousy pictures of same-sex ceremonies. Word of mouth would take care of the rest.

  2. Son of Adam
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    Yet another example of the unconstitutionality of SS"M".

  3. Randy E King
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Marriage corruption is illegal in New Mexico. The operative word in the title is "May."

    In legal terms; "May" and "Must" are absolutes and cannot be redefined. Whereas "May" means you have a choice; the word "Must" means you have no-other choice but to comply.

  4. Austin
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    @ Son of Adam

    I love how you use the constitution to deny rights to a minotiry. I am sure thats what the founders intended, the denial of rights.

  5. Lefty
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 11:33 am | Permalink

    Of course, there's nothing to stop the photographer from showing up at the event in a shirt with a message of her own choosing printed on it.

  6. warren
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    What part of "The court began by holding that the state law that bans sexual orientation discrimination in places of public accommodation applies to professional wedding photographers’ decisions not to photograph same-sex commitment ceremonies: " isn't clear?

  7. Barb Chamberlan
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    What if a gay photographer declined to photograph a wedding b/c of his beliefs or as a protest? Does anyone think the court decision would have been the same?

  8. John K. Noe
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    What if someone wanted a nude wedding ceremony? If the photographer objected then would they be violating their civil rights?

  9. Thomas
    Posted June 6, 2012 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    @austin, and I'm pretty sure the founders never thought this country would see the day that the government would try to legalize SSM, but great point smh

  10. Son of Adam
    Posted June 7, 2012 at 6:11 am | Permalink

    "I love how you use the constitution to deny rights to a minotiry. I am sure thats what the founders intended, the denial of rights."

    Austin, please show me where in the US Constitution it states that people have the right to have marriage redefined to suit their sexual proclivities?

  11. Little Man
    Posted June 7, 2012 at 8:14 am | Permalink

    No way! 'Such photography businesses are “places of public accommodation” under the language of the law.'

    The stupid law is missing an 's': It is public accommodationS.

    It follow from New Mexico's primary language being Spanish for many years. I bet you they can spell 'taco' or 'jalapeño', no problema.

    Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/accommodation

    Accommodation:
    2. adjustment of differences; reconciliation.
    3. Sociology . a process of mutual adaptation between persons or groups, usually achieved by eliminating or reducing hostility, as by compromise or arbitration.
    4. anything that supplies a need, want, favor, convenience, etc.

    -------- and:
    5. Usually, accommodations.
    a. lodging.
    b. food and lodging.
    c. a seat, berth, or other facilities for a passenger on a train, plane, etc.

    Get that minority judge an SAT Study Guide, now!