NOM BLOG

AEI Young Bloggers: Why Young Voters Won’t Tip the Gay Marriage Debate Anytime Soon

 

Lazar Berman is the American Enterprise Institute’s program manager for Foreign and Defense Policy studies. Daniel Berman has written for Fivethirtyeight.com and Chatham House on electoral politics, and is currently a graduate student at the London School of Economics:

The landslide passage of Amendment One in North Carolina, which defines marriage as between one man and one woman, should give some pause to those who believe that young voters will be enough to tilt the balance in the near future in favor of gay marriage.

Conventional wisdom holds that support for gay marriage is tied to demographic change, and there is some truth to this. On average, opposition among voters falls with age. However, this does not mean that majority support for the legalization of same-sex marriage is inevitable. There is a difference between opposing something less stridently and actually supporting it, and all the evidence available from both the results in last Tuesday’s vote on Amendment One in North Carolina and Public Policy Polling’s final poll before the vote show that voters under 30 opposed the amendment only marginally.

... If 18- to 30-year-old voters did in fact split almost evenly on Amendment One, this casts some doubt on the theory that gay marriage will ride to acceptance due to overwhelmingly supportive young voters. While young voters do seem more supportive of gay marriage, and support increases the younger the demographic in question, the operative word is supportive. Only moderately in favor of gay marriage themselves, young North Carolinians were in no position to outvote their older neighbors.

In fact, even if nobody over age 45 had voted Tuesday, the amendment still would have passed by around 8 percentage points, according to the adjusted data above.

Therefore, any strategy of waiting for demographics to realize the maximalist position of gay marriage advocates across the country looks to be, at the very least, a lengthy endeavor. States on the margins, like California and Washington, where initial bans commanded marginal majorities, might support gay marriage in the near future. But on a wider scale, movement on the issue, though real, is likely to be far too slow to bring about dramatic change nationally anytime soon.

In fact, it is quite possible that gay marriage will lose traction this November. Both Maryland and Minnesota have referenda on the ballot, and both share enough demographic similarities with North Carolina to make it likely that they will also ban gay marriage. Maryland has a large number of African-Americans who, while unlikely to turn on President Obama because of his embrace of gay marriage, are equally unlikely to accept his views on the issue. Minnesota has one of the most conservative pools of voters between the ages of 30-44 in the nation—they have even voted more Republican than their elders in recent decades. -- AEI's American.com

8 Comments

  1. Dan
    Posted May 15, 2012 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    The push for ssm has moved so rapidly, most younger folks are still ignorant of the far-reaching ramifications of ssm that have been emerging. You can tell by their tweets that those in this demographic who support ssm seem to feel they are "doing the right thing" in supporting what they've been told is a "civil rights" issue. The key is helping to educate them as to what a vote for ssm brings with it:

    http://www.frcblog.com/2012/05/the-problem-with-same-sex-marriage/

    Please share this video link with anyone you know in the 18-30 demographic.

  2. David Argue
    Posted May 15, 2012 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    This is why in states with SSM the push is on to indoctrinate kids in school with the belief that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle. He who controls the youth controls the future.

  3. OvercameSSA
    Posted May 15, 2012 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    The first two comments here are great. I'd only add that as people get older, form committed relationships, and get MARRIED, they learn the difference between marriage and faux "marriage."

    Who would have thought that male-female couples are different from same-sex couples? Sometimes you have to be part of one to get it.

  4. Jim
    Posted May 15, 2012 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    I don't think getting married makes you favor marriage discrimination! That's a stretch. The courts will ultimately decide whether gays and lesbians get equal legal rights or not, not the people.

  5. John N.
    Posted May 15, 2012 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    This is why I think even they know this. Their new stradegy is to get Obama a second term and have him appoint justices who feel the role of the Supreme Court is to further the homosexual agenda.
    Why win fair and square before the American people when you can get unelceted judges to be activists and impose it from the bench.

  6. Loving
    Posted May 16, 2012 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    I love the fact that she admits that states like CA, ME, OR and NY probably support same-sex marriage by now. If Maine and Washington approve it at the end of the year there will be a dominos effect and gay groups in all blue states including Illinois, California, Nevada, Hawaii and Rhode Island will push to have a vote on it in 2013. You could very well see half the states approve it in one year!!

  7. Louis E.
    Posted May 16, 2012 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Jim,"gays and lesbians" have the "equal legal rights" they are entitled to,just not the ones they invalidly purport.

  8. tim
    Posted May 17, 2012 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    So your entire argument is that old people will continue to vote against equality?