Comments on: New Religious Liberty Threat in Connecticut http://www.nomblog.com/23/ The official blog of the National Organization for Marriage Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:07:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Mrrobinson http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-4327 Mrrobinson Tue, 26 May 2009 20:43:30 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-4327 Good heavens...Miss Faithful has had quite enough of the Kool-Aid for one day...somebody cut her off. This blog is hilarious...it's like a competition for these folks to see who can sound the most backwards/knuckle-dragging/hair too tight in a bun crazy... Good heavens...Miss Faithful has had quite enough of the Kool-Aid for one day...somebody cut her off. This blog is hilarious...it's like a competition for these folks to see who can sound the most backwards/knuckle-dragging/hair too tight in a bun crazy...

]]> By: Ellen Nuff http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-4253 Ellen Nuff Fri, 22 May 2009 20:27:37 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-4253 Is this one of of those who believes in "family values" and that marriage is sacred? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090522/ap_on_re_us/us_tampered_soup_children What makes William Cunningham more worthy of marriage than I? Is it because he's a "man" and he married a "woman?" So he was born more worthy than I? Would you assert that he's better than I and more deserving of the rights and privileges of the civil contract of marriage? Is this one of of those who believes in "family values" and that marriage is sacred?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090522/ap_on_re_us/us_tampered_soup_children

What makes William Cunningham more worthy of marriage than I? Is it because he's a "man" and he married a "woman?" So he was born more worthy than I? Would you assert that he's better than I and more deserving of the rights and privileges of the civil contract of marriage?

]]> By: faithful http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-4147 faithful Tue, 19 May 2009 09:29:54 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-4147 The real truth is that homosexuality really represents a sad war between man and woman. The man wants unrestrained sex of multiple partners for the most part. They want sex that is hard and not involving true romantic interest. Woman generally feel abandoned by the man, and looks to another woman, feeling that they can understand each other and trust each other. The sad part is they want to force themselves into marriage and be granted a right to access children by whatever method and call it parenthood. For the most part men don't want the marriage and children. These men and women, typically were abused, neglected or both as children. Sometimes without the parents knowledge they were sexually assaulted by a homosexual or even a heterosexual. They carry this burden with them and it ends up hurting them emotionally, they feel isolated and different. Many times they have an anger that prevents them from seeing anything else. The man, may hate his mother, and feel that his father was distant and cold. The woman may feel a hate for men, as she may have been violated and no-one protected her . Many deep emotional insecurities and fear, at the same time, a desire to have a relationship and family of their own. But this does hurt the institution of Marriage, As marriage has it's core meaning of one man, one woman, Mr. & Mrs., Husband and wife, father and mother, producing children from generation to generation. The process of nature and the true gift that is granted to mankind, from God.For this is the essential and elemental and fundamental purpose of marriage, for without it we would not be born. We all need the facts of life, The truth will set you free!!! Praise Jesus!!! Amen!!! The real truth is that homosexuality really represents a sad war between man and woman. The man wants unrestrained sex of multiple partners for the most part. They want sex that is hard and not involving true romantic interest. Woman generally feel abandoned by the man, and looks to another woman, feeling that they can understand each other and trust each other. The sad part is they want to force themselves into marriage and be granted a right to access children by whatever method and call it parenthood. For the most part men don't want the marriage and children. These men and women, typically were abused, neglected or both as children. Sometimes without the parents knowledge they were sexually assaulted by a homosexual or even a heterosexual. They carry this burden with them and it ends up hurting them emotionally, they feel isolated and different. Many times they have an anger that prevents them from seeing anything else. The man, may hate his mother, and feel that his father was distant and cold. The woman may feel a hate for men, as she may have been violated and no-one protected her . Many deep emotional insecurities and fear, at the same time, a desire to have a relationship and family of their own. But this does hurt the institution of Marriage, As marriage has it's core meaning of one man, one woman, Mr. & Mrs., Husband and wife, father and mother, producing children from generation to generation. The process of nature and the true gift that is granted to mankind, from God.For this is the essential and elemental and fundamental purpose of marriage, for without it we would not be born. We all need the facts of life, The truth will set you free!!!

Praise Jesus!!! Amen!!!

]]> By: Dr. S. C. Menyhay http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-3711 Dr. S. C. Menyhay Tue, 12 May 2009 20:57:42 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-3711 Miss California’s crown robbed by a “Queen”. It would be pretty dumb to put a goat in charge of guarding a cabbage patch, and even more dumb to put a male homosexual in position to judge exceptionally pretty women in a beauty contest. Male homosexuals are known to hate women, especially the beautiful, heterosexual ones who represent love, affection family values and who are adored by Millions, particularly by real men. Such a dumb thing just happened during the Miss USA contest held in Las Vegas on April 19, 2009. A self proclaimed “Queen of all media” homosexual who was appointed judge, orchestrated a vendetta against California’s beauty delegate - unquestionably to revenge California’s strong stand against same-sex marriages. The homosexual “judge” had an obvious agenda to promote the practice of same-sex lust when he tried to corner Miss California by a loaded question and attempted to “squeeze out” of her an answer that would fully validate and unwaveringly support same-sex marriages. Miss California Carrie Prejean, representing Ninety Nine percent of the population at large, - those who respect family values - gave a straight forward, truly intelligent answer describing that, while in the US everybody is allowed to decide their preferences in life she, Carrie Prejean, due to her upbringing, believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman. In response to her answer the infuriated “judge” in his vengeful rage voted against her, and as the result, Carrie lost her crown as Miss USA, which was potentially hers. To add insult to injury, the same “judge”, Perez Hilton - the self proclaimed “Queen of all media” brutally insulted the young 21 yr old Miss California on national television - CNN NEWS, by calling her a “dumb bitch.” and further elaborated to call her the “C**“ word. We should not be surprised at the violent and irrational behavior of homosexual deviants, since they are suffering from a serious form of mental illness - a potentially violent form of self-induced psychosis which was classified as such in the text book of diseases of the American Psychiatric Association until, - due to political pressure - it was removed from the classification, however in reality it remained a serious mental disorder that society is threatened by but coerced to tolerate. In conclusion, we can say that although, Perez the homosexual “Queen” wanted to "squeeze" out an endorsement and approval for the practice of perverted same sex lust from a potentially influential, crowned pageant winner, Miss California, representing sanity, family values and the overwhelming majority of the Country, which is about Ninety Nine percent of the population, courageously stood her ground. Without any question she is the true winner! She is just as beautiful inside as on the outside, a true character of refinement with unwavering moral fortitude. Civilized people everywhere around the World are proud of her. Perez, the shameless, deeply tortured, and utterly confused character has provided proof again that deviants possess devious black souls, primarily focusing on fabrication of antisocial agendas, aiming to degenerate communities of people, to create moral confusion, disorder, chaos and destruction of our rational value system. In this case his attempt to promote same-sex lust and his brutally vulgar assault on Miss California unquestionably rendered him incompetent as a “judge” and painfully tarnished the Miss USA pageant, our time honored American tradition. Miss California’s crown robbed by a “Queen”.

It would be pretty dumb to put a goat in charge of guarding a cabbage patch, and even more dumb to put a male homosexual in position to judge exceptionally pretty women in a beauty contest. Male homosexuals are known to hate women, especially the beautiful, heterosexual ones who represent love, affection family values and who are adored by Millions, particularly by real men.

Such a dumb thing just happened during the Miss USA contest held in Las Vegas on April 19, 2009. A self proclaimed “Queen of all media” homosexual who was appointed judge, orchestrated a vendetta against California’s beauty delegate - unquestionably to revenge California’s strong stand against same-sex marriages.

The homosexual “judge” had an obvious agenda to promote the practice of same-sex lust when he tried to corner Miss California by a loaded question and attempted to “squeeze out” of her an answer that would fully validate and unwaveringly support same-sex marriages.

Miss California Carrie Prejean, representing Ninety Nine percent of the population at large, - those who respect family values - gave a straight forward, truly intelligent answer describing that, while in the US everybody is allowed to decide their preferences in life she, Carrie Prejean, due to her upbringing, believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman.
In response to her answer the infuriated “judge” in his vengeful rage voted against her, and as the result, Carrie lost her crown as Miss USA, which was potentially hers.
To add insult to injury, the same “judge”, Perez Hilton - the self proclaimed “Queen of all media” brutally insulted the young 21 yr old Miss California on national television - CNN NEWS, by calling her a “dumb bitch.” and further elaborated to call her the “C**“ word.

We should not be surprised at the violent and irrational behavior of homosexual deviants, since they are suffering from a serious form of mental illness - a potentially violent form of self-induced psychosis which was classified as such in the text book of diseases of the American Psychiatric Association until, - due to political pressure - it was removed from the classification, however in reality it remained a serious mental disorder that society is threatened by but coerced to tolerate.

In conclusion, we can say that although, Perez the homosexual “Queen” wanted to "squeeze" out an endorsement and approval for the practice of perverted same sex lust from a potentially influential, crowned pageant winner, Miss California, representing sanity, family values and the overwhelming majority of the Country, which is about Ninety Nine percent of the population, courageously stood her ground.
Without any question she is the true winner! She is just as beautiful inside as on the outside, a true character of refinement with unwavering moral fortitude. Civilized people everywhere around the World are proud of her.

Perez, the shameless, deeply tortured, and utterly confused character has provided proof again that deviants possess devious black souls, primarily focusing on fabrication of antisocial agendas, aiming to degenerate communities of people, to create moral confusion, disorder, chaos and destruction of our rational value system. In this case his attempt to promote same-sex lust and his brutally vulgar assault on Miss California unquestionably rendered him incompetent as a “judge” and painfully tarnished the Miss USA pageant, our time honored American tradition.

]]> By: Joshua J. Israel http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-3634 Joshua J. Israel Mon, 11 May 2009 22:06:54 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-3634 FIRST OF ALL: This is NOT an issue of civil rights, its a moral and ethical issue based on Liberty; and it is that gay (*#@*%*) judge that is interfering with our right to pursue HAPPINESS. We just want to get away from something that is stinky, disgusting, and immoral. We oppose that gay judge attacking our beautiful women, our values, and making us unhappy with exposure to his disgusting immoral sewage. Now, Just in case Donald Trump decides against Carrie Prejean, this should be our response: Carrie's RIGHT to support the (NOM) and marriage between a man and a woman is based on the Declaration Of Independence (that the USA is founded upon), which states that “We The People” have the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the [[ PURSUIT ]] of [[ HAPPINESS ]]. In litigation thereafter, the U .S. Supreme Court declared in,( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1); that, the freedom to marry is recognized as a vital [[ PERSONAL RIGHT ]] essential to the pursuit of happiness. As a result, that gay judge has violated the liberty rights of Carrie Prejean by condemning her pursuit of happiness to marry a MAN. The (NOM) can file suit against that gay judge, who slandered Carrie Prejean, because of her support for traditional marriage and for her pursuit of traditional happiness; because, that gay judges slanderous attack is meant to destroy Carrie's career, and livelihood, because of her LAWFUL pursuit of happiness (Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) 262 US 390). You see, Carrie didn't attack him, he attacked and slandered Carrie because she rejected his pursuit of happiness, and this the way all of you gay rabid dogs are, you exist to give us a problem, where we have none. FIRST OF ALL: This is NOT an issue of civil rights, its a moral and ethical issue based on Liberty; and it is that gay (*#@*%*) judge that is interfering with our right to pursue HAPPINESS. We just want to get away from something that is stinky, disgusting, and immoral. We oppose that gay judge attacking our beautiful women, our values, and making us unhappy with exposure to his disgusting immoral sewage. Now, Just in case Donald Trump decides against Carrie Prejean, this should be our response: Carrie's RIGHT to support the (NOM) and marriage between a man and a woman is based on the Declaration Of Independence (that the USA is founded upon), which states that “We The People” have the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the [[ PURSUIT ]] of [[ HAPPINESS ]]. In litigation thereafter, the U .S. Supreme Court declared in,( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1); that, the freedom to marry is recognized as a vital [[ PERSONAL RIGHT ]] essential to the pursuit of happiness. As a result, that gay judge has violated the liberty rights of Carrie Prejean by condemning her pursuit of happiness to marry a MAN. The (NOM) can file suit against that gay judge, who slandered Carrie Prejean, because of her support for traditional marriage and for her pursuit of traditional happiness; because, that gay judges slanderous attack is meant to destroy Carrie's career, and livelihood, because of her LAWFUL pursuit of happiness (Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) 262 US 390). You see, Carrie didn't attack him, he attacked and slandered Carrie because she rejected his pursuit of happiness, and this the way all of you gay rabid dogs are, you exist to give us a problem, where we have none.

]]> By: Larissa http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-3482 Larissa Sat, 09 May 2009 04:26:48 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-3482 I don't recall saying that either should interfere with either. I was merely pointing out the purpose of that clause, what it was originally set up to prevent. As a American-history fan and student, it really bugs me to hear people using phrases that much of the time, they don't really know what they mean. I'm not saying that's the case with James here, but I think we should all know what were talking about. I don't recall saying that either should interfere with either. I was merely pointing out the purpose of that clause, what it was originally set up to prevent.
As a American-history fan and student, it really bugs me to hear people using phrases that much of the time, they don't really know what they mean. I'm not saying that's the case with James here, but I think we should all know what were talking about.

]]> By: Rex http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-3478 Rex Sat, 09 May 2009 04:01:50 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-3478 But Larissa, you can't have "the church" interfering with "the state" without simultaneously having "the state" interfere with "the church." As soon as the government gives legal sanction to the beliefs of a particular religion, it is automatically imposing those beliefs on practitioners of other religions. This is precisely what the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses sought to avoid. But Larissa, you can't have "the church" interfering with "the state" without simultaneously having "the state" interfere with "the church."

As soon as the government gives legal sanction to the beliefs of a particular religion, it is automatically imposing those beliefs on practitioners of other religions. This is precisely what the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses sought to avoid.

]]> By: Larissa http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-3283 Larissa Fri, 08 May 2009 02:36:44 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-3283 "As much as I rant against the Mormons (for VERY good reason), I still love them as people. They are not “those’ people." I'll do my best to try and believe that. James--"Our founding fathers put separation of church and state as well as religious freedoms into our Constitution for a reason. " Do you know what that reason was? I'm a student of early American history, (at a highly-liberal university, so this isn't my religious "fanatacism" coming out) and I've studied extensively about that much-debated phrase. The reason why most of the people who began the first long-standing settlements of this country left Europe in the first place was to secure religious freedom. Almost every country in Europe of that time had state churches. That phrase, and the hope behind it, was to keep state out of the churches. Not the other way around. "As much as I rant against the Mormons (for VERY good reason), I still love them as people. They are not “those’ people."
I'll do my best to try and believe that.

James--"Our founding fathers put separation of church and state as well as religious freedoms into our Constitution for a reason. "
Do you know what that reason was? I'm a student of early American history, (at a highly-liberal university, so this isn't my religious "fanatacism" coming out) and I've studied extensively about that much-debated phrase. The reason why most of the people who began the first long-standing settlements of this country left Europe in the first place was to secure religious freedom. Almost every country in Europe of that time had state churches. That phrase, and the hope behind it, was to keep state out of the churches. Not the other way around.

]]> By: Dan http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-3208 Dan Thu, 07 May 2009 21:12:26 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-3208 Faithful (regarding post 15), I want you to substitute the "N" word, or "colored people" every time you say "the homosexuals," and see if you are not offended by your own statements. Just as you love that black boyfriend (husband?) of your daughter, you should realize that there were well-intentioned Christian folks around that were against the rights of this young man. Every time you identify us as "those people" you show your true colors as a bigot. As much as I rant against the Mormons (for VERY good reason), I still love them as people. They are not "those' people. Use a little respect and restraint, because you are only proving that you are bigoted. And, do you know what this does? It further polarizes us as people. I'm someone's son. How would you like it if I called your daughter one of "those" people, who sleeps with the "N---gers?" Stop and think for a moment. You are not painting a pleasant picture of Christians... Faithful (regarding post 15), I want you to substitute the "N" word, or "colored people" every time you say "the homosexuals," and see if you are not offended by your own statements. Just as you love that black boyfriend (husband?) of your daughter, you should realize that there were well-intentioned Christian folks around that were against the rights of this young man. Every time you identify us as "those people" you show your true colors as a bigot. As much as I rant against the Mormons (for VERY good reason), I still love them as people. They are not "those' people. Use a little respect and restraint, because you are only proving that you are bigoted. And, do you know what this does? It further polarizes us as people. I'm someone's son. How would you like it if I called your daughter one of "those" people, who sleeps with the "N---gers?" Stop and think for a moment. You are not painting a pleasant picture of Christians...

]]> By: Dan http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-3205 Dan Thu, 07 May 2009 20:54:33 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-3205 Amen, brother James! (see post 16) Preach to me... Amen, brother James! (see post 16) Preach to me...

]]> By: Dan http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-3084 Dan Thu, 07 May 2009 09:00:21 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-3084 For you marriage equality supporters, you might find hope and encouragement in this great NY Times article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/opinion/19Rich.html?_r=2&scp=3&sq=frank%20rich,%20gay%20marriage&st=cse For you marriage equality supporters, you might find hope and encouragement in this great NY Times article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/opinion/19Rich.html?_r=2&scp=3&sq=frank%20rich,%20gay%20marriage&st=cse

]]> By: James http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-2817 James Tue, 05 May 2009 23:43:27 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-2817 The simple reason that I am against all discussions of religion when it comes to political issues is the fact that there are MANY religious in this great nation. Who is to be the one to decide which religion will be represented in the laws we pass? Our founding fathers put separation of church and state as well as religious freedoms into our Constitution for a reason. People have a right to practice their religious beliefs in their churches, synagogues, or mosques, and their homes but do NOT have a right to impose those same beliefs on anyone else. The simple reason that I am against all discussions of religion when it comes to political issues is the fact that there are MANY religious in this great nation. Who is to be the one to decide which religion will be represented in the laws we pass? Our founding fathers put separation of church and state as well as religious freedoms into our Constitution for a reason. People have a right to practice their religious beliefs in their churches, synagogues, or mosques, and their homes but do NOT have a right to impose those same beliefs on anyone else.

]]> By: Faithful http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-2786 Faithful Tue, 05 May 2009 18:24:19 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-2786 When I hear the nasty comments about Christians, coming from the homosexuals, I really get full of sorrow that humans could be so cruel to a group of people that what to do the right thing and protect children from sexual deviancy and the people that practice it.Because of good parenting skills consisting of protecting youths against practices and information that is damaging or bad for them. It is a slap in the face and a stab in the heart, to parents that work hard at protecting their children with all the love that a dad and mom can consider, as good parenting skills. To really care about their children's emotional and developmental stages. And then have these people whom believe that they can sleep with anyone, and it does not affect children, is absolutely absurd. Many of these homosexuals talk trash and filth, and the fact that the educational institutions are indoctrinating children into homosexual, trans-sexual, bi-sexual and other sexual deviant practices is way over the top. What a waste of money, time and energy, not to mention utterly disgraceful. It's like these types are hooked on sex, on any type or flavor and are pushing it on innocent children, with the mindset to have their lustful and detestable desires, accepted and stamp of approval. Yes I believe fear can be a good thing, like being fearful of sexual deviants. It may just keep you safe from their lunacy and despicable behaviors. As we see Prez Hilton and his filthy mouth and his dead but brain. I am really frighten and many others, this is no way to live life, it like being in a death style, waiting for that vulture to strike down morality. When I hear the nasty comments about Christians, coming from the homosexuals, I really get full of sorrow that humans could be so cruel to a group of people that what to do the right thing and protect children from sexual deviancy and the people that practice it.Because of good parenting skills consisting of protecting youths against practices and information that is damaging or bad for them. It is a slap in the face and a stab in the heart, to parents that work hard at protecting their children with all the love that a dad and mom can consider, as good parenting skills. To really care about their children's emotional and developmental stages. And then have these people whom believe that they can sleep with anyone, and it does not affect children, is absolutely absurd. Many of these homosexuals talk trash and filth, and the fact that the educational institutions are indoctrinating children into homosexual, trans-sexual, bi-sexual and other sexual deviant practices is way over the top. What a waste of money, time and energy, not to mention utterly disgraceful. It's like these types are hooked on sex, on any type or flavor and are pushing it on innocent children, with the mindset to have their lustful and detestable desires, accepted and stamp of approval. Yes I believe fear can be a good thing, like being fearful of sexual deviants. It may just keep you safe from their lunacy and despicable behaviors. As we see Prez Hilton and his filthy mouth and his dead but brain. I am really frighten and many others, this is no way to live life, it like being in a death style, waiting for that vulture to strike down morality.

]]> By: Katie http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-2774 Katie Tue, 05 May 2009 14:23:57 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-2774 I'm so happy I've found this website. I'll be able to monitor what is going on around the nation, pray for hearts to be changed by the Holy Spirit, and e-mail our elected officials. Thanks for fighting the good fight! I'm so happy I've found this website. I'll be able to monitor what is going on around the nation, pray for hearts to be changed by the Holy Spirit, and e-mail our elected officials. Thanks for fighting the good fight!

]]> By: Faithful http://www.nomblog.com/23/comment-page-1/#comment-2757 Faithful Tue, 05 May 2009 09:02:55 +0000 http://nomblog.com/?p=23#comment-2757 God's Law is the Law, He is the Creator of Life, He gave mankind the ability to create Life, by way of a man and a woman, Mr&Mrs. Husband and wife, Father and mother, That is His Commandment, blood related family, from generation to generation. This is God's principal, morals and value. For He Created the sexes, to come together as a one man, one woman unit, to become one, to produce life, children the family. For those two, together to become as one.God put this plan for mankind in place, for a man and a woman to learn to live with the differences of the sexes, at the same time to live with the likeness, as the two can come as close to each other, to be as a whole.This is God's Plan for marriage and family. Children of God, His plan for the survival and salvation of mankind., All of humankind. Life flourishing from generation to generation. God's Law is the Law, He is the Creator of Life, He gave mankind the ability to create Life, by way of a man and a woman, Mr&Mrs. Husband and wife, Father and mother, That is His Commandment, blood related family, from generation to generation. This is God's principal, morals and value. For He Created the sexes, to come together as a one man, one woman unit, to become one, to produce life, children the family. For those two, together to become as one.God put this plan for mankind in place, for a man and a woman to learn to live with the differences of the sexes, at the same time to live with the likeness, as the two can come as close to each other, to be as a whole.This is God's Plan for marriage and family. Children of God, His plan for the survival and salvation of mankind., All of humankind. Life flourishing from generation to generation.

]]>