<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaPo Blog: Democrat Candidates Mostly Quiet on Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nomblog.com/21968/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nomblog.com/21968</link>
	<description>The official blog of the National Organization for Marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:22:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/21968/comment-page-1#comment-101735</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=21968#comment-101735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because it&#039;s a losing issue, even in blue states.  In very few districts is there any advantage to declaring yourself an SSM supporter.  Only about a quarter of voters say that the gay marriage issue is very important to them, and the majority of that group are opposed to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it's a losing issue, even in blue states.  In very few districts is there any advantage to declaring yourself an SSM supporter.  Only about a quarter of voters say that the gay marriage issue is very important to them, and the majority of that group are opposed to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John N.</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/21968/comment-page-1#comment-101673</link>
		<dc:creator>John N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=21968#comment-101673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not surprised about Elizabeth Warren, go Scott Brown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprised about Elizabeth Warren, go Scott Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.nomblog.com/21968/comment-page-1#comment-101561</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomblog.com/?p=21968#comment-101561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or it could be that the redefinition of marriage is not as popular as the polls and the government would mislead us into believing.  The push for SS&quot;M&quot; is based on judicial activism and greedy politicians motivated by campaign contributions from wealthy special interest groups.  There is no significant grassroots movement to restructure or redefine civilization&#039;s founding and most crucial institution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or it could be that the redefinition of marriage is not as popular as the polls and the government would mislead us into believing.  The push for SS"M" is based on judicial activism and greedy politicians motivated by campaign contributions from wealthy special interest groups.  There is no significant grassroots movement to restructure or redefine civilization's founding and most crucial institution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
