The New York Times is reporting in a totally surprise move that Prop 5, which would have established gender identity and sexual orientation as protected legal categories, was defeated by voters 58%-42&. The campaign against it was outspent 4-1. The main theme of the campaign (see some of their ads here) was that Alaska is already a tolerant place, and that both gay bar owners and Christian bookstore owners should be allowed to hire people with similar views on sex.
Unusual development. We report you decide:
"...In [Anchorage's] citywide ballot measure, voters overwhelmingly rejected language, known as Proposition 5, that would have added protections for people regardless of “sexual orientation or transgender identity” to the city’s civil rights laws.
A surprisingly strong turnout caused many polling sites to run out of ballots late Tuesday, and as many as 8,000 votes, possibly more, had not been counted on Wednesday, said Barbara Gruenstein, the clerk for the Municipality of Anchorage. But Proposition 5 trailed by nearly 9,000 votes, defying polls that had suggested it would succeed.
“Amazing what happens when the curtain closes behind you in a voting booth,” Jim Minnery, the chairman of Protect Your Rights Campaign — Vote No on Prop. 5, said Wednesday morning in an e-mail.
The vote followed an unusually loud and expensive campaign for a city ballot measure in Anchorage. The organizers of Proposition 5, a group called One Anchorage, included prominent politicians from both sides of the aisle (Alaska’s United States senators, Lisa Murkowski, a Republican, and Mark Begich, a Democrat, both said they supported it), and the group outspent the opposition more than 4 to 1.
One Anchorage, which had raised about $340,000 as of last week, received some of its support from outside the state, including a $25,000 donation from Tim Gill, a Colorado billionaire who has given generously to gay causes. Opposition was led by conservative religious leaders in Alaska, including within the Roman Catholic Church, and was financed largely by one source, the Anchorage Baptist Temple and its leader, the Rev. Jerry Prevo.
9 Comments
Let me guess; the polls had Prop 5 passing 57% to 43% - the standard 15 point bias that is common place within this corrupt horde.
Nobody should be surprised when marriage corruption supporters lie; these miscreants spend their entire lives lying to themselves about the intent of their own biology.
People should know better than this. The left will just sue to get the people overturned because liberals know better than us mere mortals.
“Amazing what happens when the curtain closes behind you in a voting booth,”
Indeed. Anchorage citizens recognize BS when they smell it. Looks like they need some new senators.
and this has what to do with marriage? I thought this was a group about protecting marriage and not about attacking and limiting rights of gays and lesbians
So much for NOM being about marriage and not just another anti-gay hate group.
There's a good reason why the outcome didn't match the polling: voter fraud. Dirty tricks (shocker) by the anti-gay activists are being widely reported on.
Prove that, Greg. Voter fraud is a grand old tradition in the democratic party. See Chicago - dead people voting, ACORN and all the liberal screaming about any attempt to clean up voter rolls and using picture ID's to validate voters.
And read this: http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=1571342
"So much for NOM being about marriage and not just another anti-gay hate group."
Actually, voters were smart enough to see that we're all human, and that we don't need to create special protections in order to be treated equally; our equality is already guarantied under the Constitution. Any law which singles out an individual based on identity really leads to unequal treatment under the law. It's un-American. Good for the voters of Anchorage for being savvy enough to see the truth. Sexual orientation "protections" really lead to a loss of free speech and freedom of religion, which are true rights.
They saw what happened with Catholic charities in Massachusetts and Illinois and did not want to go the same way,