First try using a name...lol Second, excellent post @ 27...

When a union where the sex of the other person has “everything” to do with it, is made into a union where the sex of the other person has “nothing” to do with it, the first union simply ceases to exist.

Making a new type of union in the society requires a new word to name it, and a vocabulary to define it. Taking an already existent word and changing the definition is violent and totally unjust to the people who cherish it, and to the realities that define it.

Also this other type of real bodily pleasure being promoted, encouraged and taught as it is, is going to effect and change the behavior and habits of our consumer kids. (We don't need to wait for some highly educated expert and in-depth psychological and sociological ivy league university study to tell us that. Mom and Dad can tell us as much.)

Leading UK homosexualist admits the condition neither genetic nor fixed

Peter Tatchell, one of Britain’s most vocal advocates of the homosexualist political movement, has admitted that sufferers of same-sex attraction are neither “born with” nor stuck with the condition.

Much of the argument upon which the promotion of homosexuality as a “legitimate lifestyle choice” is founded is the paradoxical assertion that it is not a choice at all, but a fixed state of being, probably determined by genes. This is the basis of the claim that opposition to homosexual activity is “homophobia” and tantamount to racism.

I also like how that Russian official said that prohibiting the promotion of homosexuality and transgenderism to children is not a matter of "civil rights" or liberty.

You really should proof read your submittals prior to...

Yikes!

Same-sex couples are friendships, and always sterile (as a couple). That's the bottom line.

In Hawaii, we still have the official Reciprocal Beneficiary Relationships coded in law. And that provides rights to domestic partnerships such as that of an aunt and her adult niece, if they need to live together for financial reasons. It met a great barrier, when the Attorney General, here, decided he couldn't pass on the insurance costs to the insurance companies. The same-sex civil unions law will meet the same barrier. Either everyone's insurance premiums will increase, or same-sex couples won't get covered. It's basic accounting math (not Calculus).

We cannot clone human beings, except human cells and organs (potentially). I am not suggesting experimentation on humans (like Hitler did), like on cloned children. I am saying that because we cannot experiment on humans directly, we have to let same-sex civil marriage be allowed in some States so we can use those States as mild, legal, experiments on children.

The amount of pain and confusion created in real people is just part of the experiment.

In the same way, our traffic laws (sometimes defined by corrupt legislators) experiment and it is the main source of premature death (specially when tied to excessive alcoholic swallowing - which people mildly refer to as 'drinking').

If we don't reason and make fact-based, logical, predictions, then we are indeed experimenting wildly with human life, and lives.

VI. Article
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right includes
freedom to choose and to change religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with
others and in public or in private, to manifest or choose not to manifest religion or belief, in
worship, teaching, practice and observance.
(2) In Hungary the churches and the State operate separately. Churches are independent in Hungary.
The State will cooperate with churches in the pursuit of community objectives.

VIII. Article
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
(2) Hungary recognizes and protects the freedom of the media.

MrRoivas
Red herring.

Blah blah.

Telling.

Couples that implicitly cannot procreate are different from those that can. While they might serve some sort of purpose in society, one purpose that they never serve is to create babies.

Much of human behavior is learned through imitation. Men marry women because other men marry other women; this is an important point, because society wants to encourage potentially procreating male-female couples to get married so that the children have a mom and dad.

Thus, while there are some male-female couples that are non-procreating, they nonetheless encourage other potentially procreating male-female couples, through imitation, to get married.

Contrast this with same-sex couples who can never procreate: they sever the link between procreation and marriage. They discourage marriage for those who would otherwise get married for procreative purposes and/or they encourage men to marry men or women to marry women. Same-sex "marriages" destroy marriage as an institution for procreation and discourage marriages between men and women.

The Hungarians have figured this out; good for them.

Telling.

This is relevant because of the statement of fact issued durring the most recent Royal's wedding that the Royal's recognize the institution of marriage is a construct of God designed to unite man and woman as one - a state of holy matrimony.

It's great to see the people of Hungary breaking away from the mind control of the failed EU nanny state and beginning to think for themselves.

The new constitution went in to effect the beginning of this year.
Good to see that some are taking this fight seriously.

Question. How could we translate the Hungarian word “hazasodik” into English? We can't!
If this movement is going to steal the word 'marriage' from us, (that which they are doing), than we have to come up with another one if we don't want to impoverish our language, our minds and those of our children. If we don't have one clear word than 'marriage' will not exist anymore. 'Traditional marriage' will simply just become some awkward explanation of a personal idea.