NOM BLOG

NOM Pledges $250K to Support New Hampshire Legislators Who Stand Up For Restoring Traditional Marriage; Will Challenge Those Who Vote Against the Same-Sex Marriage Repeal Bill

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 20, 2012

Contact: Elizabeth Ray or Anath Hartmann at (703-683-5004)


"We intend to hold every legislator accountable for his or her vote on marriage. Those who support HB 437 will be rewarded, while those who don’t will suffer the consequences.”
—Brian Brown, NOM's President—

Concord, NH — The National Organization for Marriage (NOM), the nation's leading pro-marriage organization, today announced that it will spend $250,000 in legislative races to help legislators who support HB 437 restoring traditional marriage and hold accountable anyone who opposes the Same-Sex Marriage Repeal Bill. The Bill, HB 437, will be up for a vote in the next few weeks.

“Sixty-one percent of New Hampshire GOP primary voters support a legislative definition of marriage as the union between a man and a woman alongside of a provision for civil unions,” stated Brian Brown, NOM's president. "We intend to hold every legislator accountable for his or her vote on marriage. Those who support HB 437 will be rewarded, while those who don’t will suffer the consequences in the next election.”

HB 437 is compromise legislation that restores the traditional definition of marriage which predates the New Hampshire Constitution, while allowing existing same-sex marriages to remain intact, and grants rights and benefits through civil unions. HB 437 is a balanced bill and is the most common sense approach in New Hampshire.

NOM has helped mount successful legislative election efforts on the same-sex marriage issue in places like Minnesota, Maine, California, New York and New Hampshire. The group is particularly effective at ending the careers of Republican officials who abandon marriage. For example, the group aired ads critical of Republican candidate Bill Binnie’s position on same-sex marriage that resulted in his defeat in the GOP US Senate primary campaign in 2010.

"In 2010 NOM was a significant player in New Hampshire and spent over $1 million in the last election. It’s humorous that our opponents loudly proclaim they will raise $100,000 to help legislators on their side when we have already invested over ten times that amount,” said Brown. “Aside from helping defeat Bill Binnie, we worked with grassroots organizations to help flip the state legislature after liberal democrats legalized same-sex marriage in 2009. NOM sent mailers and launched phone calls in 119 house races, and our endorsed candidates won all of them. A vote for HB 437 is a vote for traditional marriage. We will consider a vote against the legislation a vote for same-sex marriage, and we will hold legislators accountable. NOM will support those who support marriage and will work with local New Hampshire organizations to recruit pro-traditional marriage candidates to run against those who vote against HB 437 and fund them.”

To schedule an interview with Brian Brown, President of the National Organization for Marriage, please contact Elizabeth Ray, eray@crcpublicrelations.com, (x130) or Anath Hartmann, ahartmann@crcpublicrelations.com, (x105) at 703-683-5004.

###

6 Comments

  1. sylvatica
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 7:40 am | Permalink

    NOM is losing the battle and the Vatican is wasting it's money, bye bye Brian.

  2. 1689
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    The U.S. government’s Center for Disease Control (CDC) reports that in 2006 gay & bisexual men, less than a tiny 2% of the U.S. population (euphemistically called “men who have sex with men” or “MSM”), were getting a majority, 57%, of new AIDs cases in the US, and 64% of the new syphil-is cases. In short, a minority of new AIDs cases (43%) were spread thinly over a whopping 96+% of the remaining heterosexual U.S. population. According to the CDC, in 2007 gay & bisexual men were “44 times to 86 times” more likely than heterosexual men to contract AIDs, STDs, and other pathogens. Don’t believe it? Go to the CDC web site and read it. The increased odds for getting these diseases from homosexuality is astounding. The promiscuous nature of male homosexuality and the dangers of gay sex is supported by scientific evidence. So called "gay-marriage" and gay adoption would encourage homosexuality and undermine civilization. I fully support this web site and the position of the majority of the People, that traditional marriage must be defended!

  3. Louis E.
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    NOM and the Vatican happen to be right,and that's all that maters,Sylvatica.

  4. Stepford
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    It is a total shame that our society has moved to permiting only one opinion be allowed. We used to allow multiple opinions, multiple heritages, multiple cultures. It gave the USA a colorful joyous fabric upon which to build our lives. Now, it seems that only one shade of gray is allowed. I guess we are becoming a full Stepford community. Where has the broadmindedness gone?

  5. leehawks
    Posted January 23, 2012 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Broadmindedness is what brought all these corruptive behaviors to the forefront. Nobody wants to "offend" anyone and declare what is wrong to be wrong. The very idea that SSM, based on a perversion should be equal to traditional marriage is totally offensive.

    Broadmindedness bred acceptance of gay pride parades where simulated sex acts are performed on city streets and displays of 6 foot green phallas' where children can see. Where are the charges of public obsenity?

    Broadmindedness led to people being sued for not wanting to be associated with SSM in their business dealing because they were devoted to their faith.

    Broadmindedness brought us overturning majority voting against SSM in Prop 8 by broadminded judges and legislatives that vote this crap in without any vote of the people.

    Broadmindedness is turning into a one way street!

    SCR*W BROADMINDEDNESS......

  6. Louis E.
    Posted January 23, 2012 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    What one should criticize is not "broadmindedness",but "having a mind so open your brains fall out".