Either way, I'm all for the repeal.

Also, LET THE PEOPLE VOTE, and see how your “theory" turns out...

"MARRIAGE BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN will ALWAYS be a WINNING argument, period.

It's do or die, there is no gray area or in between, "we" are all genetically heterosexuals... No one is born gay, it would be genetically impossible. We fight in every State until people wakeup to reality about homosexuality and those who prescribes to it…

Artthur SSM is not a political issue even though others make it out to be, it’s a human issue, a moral issue...You speak of compromise as if the SSM argument is worthy of one...

It is our duty as humans for the survival of our society, and future societies to come, to discourage others from homosexuality and to stay on the right side of the issue... not the wrongs side! SSM homosexuality should be discouraged in all 50 plus States, and we work together until that happens, period! Or can give the SSMers NH, while the rest of us move out of that area, and let mother nature take its course… problem solved!
:.)

And I wouldn't trust the polls on this issue if I were you. They are mostly conducted by those who favor SS"M" and know how to structure questions that get the answers they want.

New Hampshire is very liberal socially. You saw the clips of Santorum being booed by college REPUBLICANS on his stance against gay marriage.

In states like Alabama, where religion is extremely important, in New Hampshire, it isn't and the state's politics reflect that.

Regardless of whatever spin the mainstream media and gay activist magazines spoon feed you, support for SS"M" is not nearly as high as you want to believe, otherwise, the NH legislature wouldn't be discussing a repeal at all. Remember that SS"M" enjoyed "overwhelming public support" in CA and ME before it was voted down in both states by referendum.

By taking leftist propoganda as gospel, you are only setting yourself up for a crushing disappointment when this vote eventually comes around.

New Hampshire OVERWHELMINGLY approves of same sex marriage, and the majority of the citizens did not want social issues to be involved. The GOP took it among themselves to do so. For a republican to keep their post, the only safe thing to do is focus on nothing but jobs and economy. To start voting on social issues in New Hapmshire is a guaranteed way to lose the next election.

Like in California, why does it consistently vote democrat? It's not because of social issues, it's because the people in the major cities of L.A., Sacremento and San Fransisco expect the government to provide for them.

As mentioned, New Hampshire is not very religious at all. As a result, they are extremely liberal on social issues because they are looking at the world from that standpoint. If same sex marriage is repealed this year, it most definetely will be back next election cycle.

However, say it passes and the law is repealed, this is what will happen: During the next election cycle, Democrats will regain the majority and restore same sex marriage. That is a given.

New Hampshire hasn't had a Republican controlled congress in years because it is an extremely blue state. The only reason they have a Republican controlled congress now is because of the Tea Party hype and people wanted more fiscally conservative representatives. Once in office, these new republicans also started putting through laws focusing on social issues, which the majority of the people do not like.

New Hampshire is one of the least religious states and extremely liberal on social issues (Just look at how poorly Santorum did there on the same ultra-religious platform). Every poll coming out of New Hampshire favors keeping the law in place. If it is repealed, it will be back next year.