Comments on: NYTimes Blog on "Leading Social Conservative Group" NOM's New Ron Paul Ad in Iowa http://www.nomblog.com/17231 The official blog of the National Organization for Marriage Sat, 18 May 2013 05:19:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: John http://www.nomblog.com/17231/comment-page-1#comment-81015 John Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:51:38 +0000 http://www.nomblog.com/?p=17231#comment-81015 Hilarious. This ad convinced me Ron was without doubt the only one correct on marriage..

]]> By: ResistSSA http://www.nomblog.com/17231/comment-page-1#comment-80617 ResistSSA Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:48:53 +0000 http://www.nomblog.com/?p=17231#comment-80617 Someone should ask him if he thinks it should be legal for a man to marry a dog. As a libertarian, his answer should be the same.

The media will never ask the question.

]]> By: Kathy http://www.nomblog.com/17231/comment-page-1#comment-80614 Kathy Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:10:20 +0000 http://www.nomblog.com/?p=17231#comment-80614 Wow....I guess I really had no real idea WHERE exactly Ron Paul stood. Now, I know he is simply an Obama-type in sheep's clothing. He is NOT for America....no way...no how!

]]> By: David Hamaker http://www.nomblog.com/17231/comment-page-1#comment-80609 David Hamaker Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:09:05 +0000 http://www.nomblog.com/?p=17231#comment-80609 You have now lost my support. The constitution is paramount, and Ron Paul is the only candidate who follows it to the letter. His position on Marriage is that the States should decide the matter, not the federal government. He thinks the People should vote on it, and that's what I thought NOM stood for. Apparently NOM thinks it's more important to support candidates who pay them lip service and attack those who refuse to sign a non-binding pledge, than it is to spend my contribution on protecting marriage at the ballot box. Well guess what? I didn't really have any money to spare, but I gave it to you anyway because I believe in Marriage. I hope you are ashamed at wasting my money on attacking the only honest man in congress.

]]> By: Nicole http://www.nomblog.com/17231/comment-page-1#comment-80599 Nicole Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:54:49 +0000 http://www.nomblog.com/?p=17231#comment-80599 As a Bible-believing follower of Christ who volunteers for a pro-marriage organization, I support Ron Paul for president. Dr. Ron Paul is 100% pro-marriage, but wisely understands the dangers of giving the federal government the power to define (or redefine marriage), thus usurping states' power. Ron Paul believes a better way to protect the institution of marriage is to support the Defense of Marriage Act to ensure no state would be forced to recognize a corrupted redefinition of marriage. Ron Paul was an original cosponsor of the Marriage Protection Act, HR 3313, which removes challenges to DOMA from federal courts' jurisdiction. Additionally, he opposes any attempt by rogue judges to impose a new definition of marriage on the people. I am truly saddened that NOM chose to hide the true nature of Ron Paul's pro-marriage ideals.

]]> By: Little man http://www.nomblog.com/17231/comment-page-1#comment-80591 Little man Thu, 29 Dec 2011 03:56:36 +0000 http://www.nomblog.com/?p=17231#comment-80591 Follow the link at the bottom of the post, to wrongonmarriage.com, and proceed to allow the blog to open. It worked for me, this way.

]]> By: Zack http://www.nomblog.com/17231/comment-page-1#comment-80589 Zack Thu, 29 Dec 2011 03:20:35 +0000 http://www.nomblog.com/?p=17231#comment-80589 It says the video is private.

]]>