Law professors attending Argentina’s most important conference on civil law have voted to declare that the nation’s recently-passed homosexual “marriage” legislation is unconstitutional.
The legal scholars also recommended the prohibition of homosexual adoption, and condemned the legal concept of multiple mothers or fathers of the same child as incompatible with the nation’s civil code.
... The Symposium, which is the largest of its kind for civil attorneys in Argentina, reported its highest attendance to date this year, with over 2,200 participating, including professors of law, practicing attorneys, and law students. Only law professors have the right to vote.
4 Comments
Just maybe we won't have to wait a generation for the evils of marriage corruption to be fully understood by everybody.
Newt Gingrich was correct when he said that we need to start sending these traitor politicians to prison for their backroom deals.
I second that Randy, and it is good to see that at least judges in Argentina understand that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Randy, that's my greatest hope: that we don't do another corrupting experiment with the institution of marriage and have to wait a generation for people to see the harm.
I'm glad to see such wise professors in Argentina.
The thing is that law professors in different countries have different national constitutions to operate by. Some law professors in the USA have figured there is room in the USA Constitution and Amendments to believe civil same-sex marriage is a right, without thinking of the repercussions or social and economical consequences. This is typical behavior of professors who desperately want to make a name for themselves, publishing technical papers on novel ideas without sufficient logical basis, but a whole lot of rationalization, and rhetoric. Unfortunately, our academic system rewards professors simplistically for the total number of publications in technical journals. It leads to a constant out-pour of new paradigms, which, although these cannot stand for long, they reward the professor, short-term. It should be emphasized to their universities how, in the long-term, this system has embarrassed their institution (long-term too).