We have the means to measure attraction -- MRI scans have been shown to work. Why have none of the success stories come forward to undergo such a scan to prove that they've changed orientation rather than modified their behavior?

David in Houston will be pleased to know that NOM supports the rights homosexuals ALREADY have to get married to the opposite-sexed person of their choice; the same privilege granted to ALL Americans, regardless of sexual orientation. Lest David confuses this with homosexual discrimination, he can pause and consider that not all opposite-sexed couples are eligible for marriage, such as siblings, and that not all same-sexed couples are homosexual, nor do all same-sexed couples qualify for a marriage license, even in states with gender-segregated public unions (aka SS"M").

Homosexuality in marriage is a non-issue, in a society where we do not discriminate based on sexual orientation. That is how we maintain equal treatment for all.

Does that include endorsing violent criminal behavior against those with an opposing viewpoint? If so, that's a hate-crime. What about tolerance?

David in Houston,the orphanage is doing evil in allowing the "gay couple" to take the child.

Roberto will be pleased to know that all citizens already enjoy all rights and privileges granted to all citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation, as behooves a society which exercises blind justice.

I find it hilarious that you're actually promoting the idea that sexual orientation is a choice. That ship sailed decades ago; and that study has already been debunked on Box Turtle Bulletin. A 6% success rate is hardly anything to crow about. The funny thing is, the only people that keep making this absurd claim are religious straight people. I wonder why that is?

"It will crash against the rock that truth does exist, human nature does exist, and children do need their mother and father." -- No one has claimed otherwise. Human nature has shown that homosexuality has existed throughout history. It also exists in the animal kingdom. Hopefully you don't think two gay penguins represent "the will to evil". If children are fortunate enough to have a mother and father, that's great. Of course, there is no guarantee that the child's will be loved or taken care of properly. But that's not your concern, as long as the child has a mom and a dad it's all good. 20 million children are raised by a single-parent. Some children are raised by grand-parents, or step-parents; and some children that were abandoned by their biological parents have been adopted by gay couples. So who exactly is "the will to evil" in that scenario? The gay couple that rescued the child from an orphanage, or the biological parents that discarded the child?